On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Wes Wannemacherw...@wantii.com wrote:
It is a large multi-module build (the struts2 build, in fact) and a
quick glance/grep through poms didn't yield any obvious entries
pointing to download.java.net, but I will dig further tomorrow. I
noticed the same thing at
It scans through your project's dependencies, looks for licenses
definitions, and tries to download them (based on given license URL) into a
destination you designate via outputDirectory parameter (defaults to
${project.build.directory}/licenses). It can do the license
scanning/downloading quietly
It would much more powerful to perform that transformation when you actually
deploy the artifacts on the server instead of burning the value in something
you could potentially deploy on the repository
I would leave the token in the file and add a filtering procedure when the
app is built and
Thanks for your answers. Is it possible to filter the contents of an EAR? I
thought you could only do that by previously unpacking the resources in a
tmp directory.
snicoll wrote:
It would much more powerful to perform that transformation when you
actually
deploy the artifacts on the
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Sergio Rodriguez srodrig...@teralco.comwrote:
Thanks for your answers. Is it possible to filter the contents of an EAR? I
thought you could only do that by previously unpacking the resources in a
tmp directory.
Then you misunderstood my proposal. My proposal
Looking at
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/inclusion-exclusion.html
the pattern includes the java source file, e.g. *Test.java. But does it
really relate to the source file pattern?
In my case *Test.java also includes groovy test files like FooTest.groovy. I
guess
Just to mention:-
I had a problem with downloads.
Information from
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Mirrors+Repositories
The mirrors mentioned as synced independently mostly don't work and some of
those pushed directly from central may not, I would need to test further.
I found reliable
Well, could you give us at least an excerpt of your pom?
I'm guessing you want to use some jar and didn't acknowledge the local maven
repository existence, but I might be wrong.
In fact you seem to be trying to directory use some given jar that's been
produced by another projet.
But this is all
Hello,
I've tried to put the classes that were instrumented by Cobertura on the
classpath so EasyB could find them. Just so Cobertura could see that my
classes are in fact tested. I had found a solution based on the Maven Antrun
plugin, but due to a bug in this plugin (which I reported in Jira:
Hi,
I want to configure in the maven-dependency-plugin in the POM the goal
purge-local-repository. Now I have the problem that I want to exclude a
artifact from this mechanism. How can I configure this in the POM.
My code looks like this:
plugin
Hi,
i try to get two source folders in my project. As a second source folder I'm
going to use resources directory. I can set **/*.java in include. But in
conflicts between include and exclude, exclude wins.
How can I remove a default exclude **/*.java from resources?:confused:
--
View this
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Barrie Treloar baerr...@gmail.com wrote:
Run
mvn help:effective-pom epom.txt
This will show you the complete repositories defined in the inheritance
chain.
You can also check your settings.xml to see whether you are pointing
to something wierd.
Maybe you can put have *two* executions of the antrun plugin?
But, going to the original issue, it appears that the instrumented cobertura
classes
*should* be in the classpath of the maven reactor? Because I look at the
source
for the instrumented goal..this is what it shows
// Set
Hi Mohan,
I'm not quite sure what you're saying, but yeah, as far as I know the
instrumented files have to be on the classpath for EasyB to pick them up.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Putting-instrumented-classes-on-the-classpath-tp24183679p24184602.html
Sent from the
Thats good to know Stevo. Thanks.
Is there a site which describes this plugin and its goals?
---
Todd Thiessen
-Original Message-
From: Stevo Slavic [mailto:ssla...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 2:34 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: How does maven handle
We are pleased to announce the release of Maven Doxia and Maven Doxia Sitetools,
version 1.1.1.
Doxia is a content generation framework that provides powerful techniques for
generating static and dynamic content: Doxia can be used in a web-based publishing
context to generate static sites,
Has anybody spotted the site descriptor being deployed without a gpg
signature when using the release plugin to run a release?
If so, did you find a configuration to fix the problem?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
i try to get two source folders in my project. As a second source folder I'm
going to use resources directory. I can set **/*.java in include. But in
conflicts between include and exclude, exclude wins.
You should use the build-helper-maven-plugin to add the second source directory.
Wayne
The base directory's POM.xml:
project
modelVersion4.0.0/modelVersion
properties
base.version2.1.2-SNAPSHOT/base.version
/properties
groupIdcom.solbright/groupId
version${base.version}/version
artifactIdbase/artifactId
packagingpom/packaging
namebase/name
when doing a:
mvn verify -DanyParam=true
anyParam property is available inside pom.xml, but not passed through to my
running test-suite in surefire or failsafe plugin, which is very annoying
because I have to manuall pass through these vars (by defining custom
properties in pom and referring it
none that I know... the passthrough that used to happen previously was
AFAIK considered a bug...
also consider that you need to purge certain properties from
passthrough, e.g. java debugger port to bind to
-Stephen
2009/6/24 aldana ald...@gmx.de:
when doing a:
mvn verify -DanyParam=true
I see
but at least I won't forget this, it took me a while to find out why passing
-D params on the CLI did not have any effect on my plugin-setting.
Stephen Connolly-2 wrote:
none that I know... the passthrough that used to happen previously was
AFAIK considered a bug...
also
what I think would be a good idea is allowing the specification of a
list of regexs to match properties to pass through and a list of
regexs to match properties to exclude... with exclude taking priority
over include, and exclude having a default set to exclude the pain
points that drove the
I don't think so, but I believe I've explained pretty much everything about
it. I found about it from
thishttps://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBBUILD-477task in JBoss
JIRA. From there I followed a link to plugin source code. The plugin
mojo
I'm sure there is an accepted way of handling this problem, but I
haven't found it, yet.
I have a text document (release notes) that I need to include in my
assembly. Right now, I just use a FileDependency tag in the
assembly.xml to go grab the document from its module. The document
lives in
Hi David,
[sorting the mail]
Another question: I build the base.jar file, and the other two
projects depend upon that file. I've setup the POMs to show this
dependency: Everything builds, but when I run analyze:dependency, it
tells me it is missing base.jar
[snip]
The base directory's
I have a problem doing an inplace tomcat deploy with the tomcat-maven-plugin.
If I use the src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xml location for my web.xml the
jspc plugin adds on the the end of the file on every execution, making
redundant entries. Also, I really don't want to check the modified
I also think this would be a nice enhancement.
You mentioned filing JIRA ticket against surefire-plugin, but isn't this
more related to the maven core handling of -D envs and is better placed in
maven2-JIRA?
Stephen Connolly-2 wrote:
what I think would be a good idea is allowing the
baerrach wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 3:28 AM, Shesadri
Parthasarathysparthasarat...@sapient.com wrote:
Hi ,
We are working for one of our clients and all our development happens
thru Eclipse 3.1. We are using Maven Project for Build and deployment
process. As there is some issues in
afaik, it is surefire that forks the jvm, so surefire is where I would
file the jira
if you roll your surefire version back to perhaps 2.3 you'd see the
system properties being passed through
Sent from my [rhymes with myPod] ;-)
On 24 Jun 2009, at 22:49, aldana ald...@gmx.de wrote:
I
30 matches
Mail list logo
