Re: Using Jenkins Mask Password plugin

2013-11-14 Thread Baptiste Mathus
Hi, This list is for Maven users. What you ask should be posted on the Jenkins users mailing list : https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/jenkinsci-users Cheers 2013/11/13 Anand Sudabattula anand.sudabatt...@gmail.com Hi We like to mask the password that is provided thro’ cq.password

Dependency exclusions being ignored

2013-11-14 Thread Jason Tesser
I have the following POM http://pastebin.com/P4TvzqJn but my exclusion for artifactIdabdera-client/artifactId are not being respected. Actually only 2 of them are not the 2 not working are maven-plugins and maven-plugins they are coming down anyways see http://pastebin.com/c59HM8Bj what am I

Re: Dependency exclusions being ignored

2013-11-14 Thread Stuart McCulloch
Try adding: typeplugin/type to those 2 dependency exclusions. ( the jaxen pom: http://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=jaxen/jaxen/1.1.3/jaxen-1.1.3.pom declares those dependencies to be of type plugin ) On 14 Nov 2013, at 13:14, Jason Tesser wrote: I have the following POM

Re: Dependency exclusions being ignored

2013-11-14 Thread Jason Tesser
you are referring to the maven-plugins I think But what about the xml-api thing? On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Stuart McCulloch mccu...@gmail.com wrote: Try adding: typeplugin/type to those 2 dependency exclusions. ( the jaxen pom:

Re: Dependency exclusions being ignored

2013-11-14 Thread Jason Tesser
Also that doesn't work. Invalid POM cannot say exclusion groupIdmaven-plugins/groupId artifactIdmaven-cobertura-plugin/artifactId typeplugin/type /exclusion On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Jason Tesser jasontes...@gmail.com wrote: you are referring to the maven-plugins I think But what

Re: Dependency exclusions being ignored

2013-11-14 Thread Jörg Schaible
Stuart McCulloch wrote: Try adding: typeplugin/type to those 2 dependency exclusions. Nice try. Violates schema. ( the jaxen pom: http://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=jaxen/jaxen/1.1.3/jaxen-1.1.3.pom declares those dependencies to be of type plugin ) On 14 Nov 2013,

Feature idea - global excludes

2013-11-14 Thread Lyons, Roy
Today the dependency exclude works on a artifact by artifact basis. I was just thinking that someone might want to do a blanket exclude without having to dependency:tree -Dverbose=true to see all the items which might have it... Before submitting an enhancement request, I thought I would get

Re: compile failure warning and build succesfull?

2013-11-14 Thread DennisV
I happened to have the same problem. However, in my case it was reproducible both in Eclipse (with m2eclipse) and as command-line build. The problem was resolved once I configured the maven compiler plugin to not fork: groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId

Re: Dependency exclusions being ignored

2013-11-14 Thread Stuart McCulloch
You mean the POM relocation to an other version number is not fully supported in Gradle message? If you look at the pom it has a relocation element (bit like a symbolic link): http://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=xml-apis/xml-apis/2.0.2/xml-apis-2.0.2.pom

Re: Feature idea - global excludes

2013-11-14 Thread Cemo
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1977 :) Will be fixed in 3.2 On 14 November 2013 16:51, Lyons, Roy roy.ly...@cmegroup.com wrote: Today the dependency exclude works on a artifact by artifact basis. I was just thinking that someone might want to do a blanket exclude without having to

Re: Dependency exclusions being ignored

2013-11-14 Thread Stuart McCulloch
Doh, sorry - worth a try :) You could try forcing jaxen to 1.1.4 (using dependencyManagement) as that version doesn't have those odd plugin dependencies On 14 Nov 2013, at 14:36, Jason Tesser wrote: Also that doesn't work. Invalid POM cannot say exclusion groupIdmaven-plugins/groupId

Re: Feature idea - global excludes

2013-11-14 Thread Stephen Connolly
My understanding is that a POM schema change would require a major version bump, so such a feature will *not* be in any version called 3.2 On 14 November 2013 14:53, Cemo cemalettin@gmail.com wrote: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1977 :) Will be fixed in 3.2 On 14 November 2013

Re: Dependency exclusions being ignored

2013-11-14 Thread Stuart McCulloch
BTW, I ran your pom.xml through: mvn dependency:tree using Maven3 and the exclusions for those 2 maven-plugins were respected, which suggests your exclusion issue might also be specific to Gradle. On 14 Nov 2013, at 14:53, Stuart McCulloch wrote: You mean the POM relocation to an

Access denied downloading artifact from nexus

2013-11-14 Thread KARR, DAVID
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org

Access denied downloading artifact from nexus

2013-11-14 Thread KARR, DAVID
(Sorry for the initial blank body. Not sure what happened there.) I'm having trouble downloading an artifact from a nexus pro repo in a Maven build on a build server. I don't know if this is a Maven problem, or a Nexus problem, although it's probably the former. I'm working on a Maven build

Re: Access denied downloading artifact from nexus

2013-11-14 Thread Russell Gold
HI David. Try accessing http://nexusprohost.com:8084/nexus/content/groups/cditspoc/com/oracle/coherence/coherence/12.1.2-0-0/coherence-12.1.2-0-0.pom via your browser. That will test if it is a maven problem or a nexus problem. On Nov 14, 2013, at 4:35 PM, KARR, DAVID dk0...@att.com wrote:

RE: Access denied downloading artifact from nexus

2013-11-14 Thread KARR, DAVID
-Original Message- From: Russell Gold [mailto:r...@gold-family.us] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 1:44 PM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: Access denied downloading artifact from nexus HI David. Try accessing

Re: Access denied downloading artifact from nexus

2013-11-14 Thread Russell Gold
OK, that narrows things down. While it is possible to work with a repo that requires credentials to download artifacts, doing so will require you to supply credentials in your settings.xml. Is there some reason you want to do this? I know coherence is commercial rather than open-source. Are

Re: maven-failsafe-plugin: what is it actually intended for?

2013-11-14 Thread Matthew Adams
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact-software.com wrote: On 13/11/2013 11:16 AM, Matthew Adams wrote: I don't think timing should be the heuristic here. The fact that unit tests take less is a result of the fact that what you're testing, aka the unit, tends to be

Re: Access denied downloading artifact from nexus

2013-11-14 Thread Adrien Rivard
Given the 401 changed in 403 ,it seems to me that the credentials are correct but you are still not allowed to access this artifact/repository. I would suggest to contact the nexus administrator On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Russell Gold r...@gold-family.us wrote: OK, that narrows things

Re: maven-failsafe-plugin: what is it actually intended for?

2013-11-14 Thread Matthew Adams
Here's a bit less philosophical, more practical description of Surefire v. Failsafe. Remember that if you use the maven-surefire-plugin, it's going to execute during the Maven test phase by default, and fail the build on errors _during that phase_ if any tests fail. The maven-failsafe-plugin

Re: Override reportSets via combine.self=override?

2013-11-14 Thread Olivier Lamy
On 7 November 2013 08:53, Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, say I have a parent pom, which defines: plugin groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId artifactIdmaven-surefire-report-plugin/artifactId version2.16/version

pluginManagement questions

2013-11-14 Thread Laird Nelson
Suppose I have a parent pom that makes use of the maven-enforcer-plugin. As a matter of fact I do, and it's public, so you can follow along at home: parent groupIdorg.sonatype.oss/groupId artifactIdoss-parent/artifactId version7/version /parent Looking at that pom, there is this

Re: maven-failsafe-plugin: what is it actually intended for?

2013-11-14 Thread Vincent Latombe
you mean 'verify', not 'validate' Vincent 2013/11/14 Matthew Adams matt...@matthewadams.me Here's a bit less philosophical, more practical description of Surefire v. Failsafe. Remember that if you use the maven-surefire-plugin, it's going to execute during the Maven test phase by default,

Re: maven-failsafe-plugin: what is it actually intended for?

2013-11-14 Thread Vincent Latombe
maven-failsafe-plugin implies some specific steps are required *before* (pre-integration-test) and *after* (post-integration-test) the test execution, which allows to do fire up a container then turn it off after the tests (for example). Then, only after these, the test results are evaluated