Re: Is it possible to deliberately have two dependencies with the same groupid, artifactid, and packaging, but different version?

2014-01-13 Thread Barrie Treloar
On 14 January 2014 10:54, KARR, DAVID wrote: > I have a situation where it would be convenient for my pom to have two > dependencies that are almost identical, only being different by the version. > The makeup of the artifact is such that it would be safe (and intended) to > use both of them.

Re: Running cleanup code after tests in multi-module project.

2014-01-13 Thread Barrie Treloar
On 14 January 2014 10:49, Todd Chapman wrote: > Anders, > > I agree with you. Unfortunately I inherited this project and there is setup > required that is identical for each module and is expensive to set up and > tear down. It will take time to refactor the tests to be less expensive to > prepare

Is it possible to deliberately have two dependencies with the same groupid, artifactid, and packaging, but different version?

2014-01-13 Thread KARR, DAVID
I have a situation where it would be convenient for my pom to have two dependencies that are almost identical, only being different by the version. The makeup of the artifact is such that it would be safe (and intended) to use both of them. The Java package used in each is similar, but differe

Re: Running cleanup code after tests in multi-module project.

2014-01-13 Thread Todd Chapman
Anders, I agree with you. Unfortunately I inherited this project and there is setup required that is identical for each module and is expensive to set up and tear down. It will take time to refactor the tests to be less expensive to prepare. In the mean time I'm looking for ways to deal with situ

Re: New logo?

2014-01-13 Thread Paul Benedict
Great logo, but yes, an orange hat too similar to red hat. If we're using an Apache feather, maybe we can use a Cowboy hat to complete the theme? On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Adam Retter wrote: > My personal fear of the hat, is that it is too similar to Redhat IMHO. > > > On 13 January 2014

Re: New logo?

2014-01-13 Thread Adam Retter
My personal fear of the hat, is that it is too similar to Redhat IMHO. On 13 January 2014 22:29, John Miller wrote: > Well I guess the attachment did not go through.. > > > > [image: Maven Hat..jpg] > > > > > > Thanks > > John > > > > > --

Re: New logo?

2014-01-13 Thread Ron Wheeler
Perhaps Roy's wife's story belongs on the front page of the Maven site. It pretty clearly lays out the key conversion consideration for new users. Ron On 13/01/2014 3:46 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: Are you working on something? or just leaving us in the dark! On 13 January 2014 19:22, John M

RE: New logo?

2014-01-13 Thread John Miller
Well I guess the attachment did not go through..    ThanksJohn  - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org

javap Maven plugin?

2014-01-13 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, for analysis of bytecode produced by different java compilers I need to decompile class files. I may resort to antrun and write some groovy script which invokes the javap CLI. However I'd like some input whether anyone knows a Maven plugin which already produces such output or whether a new

Re: New logo?

2014-01-13 Thread Stephen Connolly
Are you working on something? or just leaving us in the dark! On 13 January 2014 19:22, John Miller wrote: > OK saw the images and thought a combination of two looked nice. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Lyons, Roy [mailto:roy.ly...@cmegroup.com] > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 8:3

Re: Running cleanup code after tests in multi-module project.

2014-01-13 Thread Anders Hammar
IMO each Maven project should be independent, even test projects. So there should be cleanup code in each module. On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Todd Chapman wrote: > What is the best way to run cleanup code after testing a multi-module > project? > > Basically, post-integration-test for the

RE: New logo?

2014-01-13 Thread John Miller
OK saw the images and thought a combination of two looked nice. -Original Message- From: Lyons, Roy [mailto:roy.ly...@cmegroup.com] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 8:37 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: New logo? I asked my wife on the drive to the train today what animal she thinks

Re: New logo?

2014-01-13 Thread Lyons, Roy
I asked my wife on the drive to the train today what animal she thinks fits Maven. Her response made me chuckle. Without hesitation, she said "Honey Badger" When I asked why, she said that Honey Badgers are part of nature and generally do their thing nicely -- but if you piss it off, things will

Re: New logo?

2014-01-13 Thread Arnaud Héritier
My brother played a little bit this week-end with our logo and especially with our Apache Feather [image: Inline image 1] [image: Inline image 2] I added them in the wiki : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Logo+contest He will try to give more ideas soon HTH cheers Arnaud On M

RE: New logo?

2014-01-13 Thread Will Hoover
I have a wiki account (whoover), but it doesn't look like I have access to edit the page. -Original Message- From: Stephen Connolly [mailto:stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 3:24 PM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: New logo? Somebody with wiki access will a

[ANN] Mojo's SQLJ Maven Plugin 1.3 Released

2014-01-13 Thread Anders Hammar
Hi, The Mojo team is pleased to announce the release of Mojo's SQLJ Maven Plugin version 1.3. http://mojo.codehaus.org/sqlj-maven-plugin/ To get this update, simply specify the version in your project's plugin configuration: org.codehaus.mojo sqlj-maven-plugin 1.3 Release

Re: Maven / Java 1.7 compliance

2014-01-13 Thread rahulmishramail
Hi Johannes For a long time, i was facing the same issue. But i finally got the solution. If you are using maven version 3.0.4 or above, then certainly your code will compile in 1.7. Just add the below two properties in the section of your project Pom file. 1.7 1.7 The code will compile fine in