On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> As "cute" as "Shutgun" might seem, for some unspecified definition of
> "cute", I am sick of hearing about any kind of gun...
>
> http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-school-shootings-sandy-hook-20141211-story.html
Same here.
A - Shotgun
Emiliollbb
On Dec 15, 2014 11:40 AM, "Stephen Connolly" <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing.
This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins.
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with the potenti
B (no guns)
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing.
>
> This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with the pote
I guess I should VOTE B, but I am not on the PMC so I am not sure which
votes count.
Gary
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You raise a fair point, and for that reason I am changing my vote to
>
> B
>
> On 15 December 2014 at 13:15, Ga
B
2014-12-16 0:26 GMT+02:00 Stephen Connolly
:
>
> You raise a fair point, and for that reason I am changing my vote to
>
> B
>
> On 15 December 2014 at 13:15, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > As "cute" as "Shutgun" might seem, for some unspecified definition of
> > "cute", I am sick of hearing about
You raise a fair point, and for that reason I am changing my vote to
B
On 15 December 2014 at 13:15, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> As "cute" as "Shutgun" might seem, for some unspecified definition of
> "cute", I am sick of hearing about any kind of gun...
>
> http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nation
[B]: The Maven Owl
On 15 December 2014 at 18:59, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
>
> B
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le lundi 15 décembre 2014 10:39:27 Stephen Connolly a écrit :
> > After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing.
> >
> > This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wi
B
Regards,
Hervé
Le lundi 15 décembre 2014 10:39:27 Stephen Connolly a écrit :
> After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing.
>
> This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with the potential of an
> extension
B
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
>
> B.
>
> Kalle
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Tim Astle wrote:
> >
> > A - Shotgun
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> > On 12/15/2014 6:39 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> >
> >> After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing.
> >>
>
B.
Kalle
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Tim Astle wrote:
>
> A - Shotgun
>
> Tim
>
>
> On 12/15/2014 6:39 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
>
>> After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing.
>>
>> This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins.
>>
>> The vote will be op
A - Shotgun
Tim
On 12/15/2014 6:39 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing.
This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins.
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with the potential of an
extension until I send a message say
A - Shotgun
Stephen Connolly wrote on 15.12.2014 02:39:
> After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing.
>
> This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with the potential of an
> extension until I send a message
Hi Stephen,
that is actually the way it is setup. With one minor problem, the
installers need the javadocs from the other modules as well. And we do
not build them during the normal built because of performance reasons
(it takes ~15mins to create them).
You are right, the installer modules c
Wrong track.
On 15 December 2014 at 13:13, Christian Domsch wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a continuous integration setup where the build is setup in two
> steps. First all modules are built and deployed. After that a second build
> is triggered that takes those artifacts and builds installers from th
B
Martijn
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:27 PM, David Hoffer wrote:
> B
>
> -Dave
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:22 AM, wrote:
>>
>> B
>>
>> Cody Fyler
>> Lending Grid Build Team
>> G=Lending Grid Builds
>> (515) – 441 - 0814
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Stephen Connolly [mailto:stephen.
B
-Dave
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:22 AM, wrote:
>
> B
>
> Cody Fyler
> Lending Grid Build Team
> G=Lending Grid Builds
> (515) – 441 - 0814
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Connolly [mailto:stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 4:39 AM
> To: Maven Users
B
Cody Fyler
Lending Grid Build Team
G=Lending Grid Builds
(515) – 441 - 0814
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Connolly [mailto:stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 4:39 AM
To: Maven Users List; Maven Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun"
As "cute" as "Shutgun" might seem, for some unspecified definition of
"cute", I am sick of hearing about any kind of gun...
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-school-shootings-sandy-hook-20141211-story.html
Gary
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Jeroen Hoek wrote:
>
> B
>
> 2014-1
Hi,
I have a continuous integration setup where the build is setup in two
steps. First all modules are built and deployed. After that a second
build is triggered that takes those artifacts and builds installers from
that.
Because of performance reasons and they are only needed for the
insta
A
Alexis.
On 15/12/2014 11:39, Stephen Connolly wrote:
After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing.
This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins.
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with the potential of an
extension until I send a message saying that
A
Am Montag, 15. Dezember 2014 schrieb Stephen Connolly :
> After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing.
>
> This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with the potential of an
> extension until I send a message
On 15 Dec 2014, at 12:39 PM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing.
>
> This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with the potential of an
> extension until I send a message sa
B
2014-12-15 12:41 GMT+01:00 Martin Grigorov :
> B
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> A
>>
>> On 15 December 2014 at 10:39, Stephen Connolly <
B
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> A
>
> On 15 December 2014 at 10:39, Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > After the run-o
A
On 15 December 2014 at 10:39, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing.
>
> This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with the potential of an
>
After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing.
This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins.
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with the potential of an
extension until I send a message saying that the polls are closed)
There will be no discussion in this
On the basis of any preference expressed:
H: has 12 preferences expressed
K: has 10 preferences expressed
B: has 6 preferences expressed
I declare the winners of the run-off to be H and K (i.e. "Shotgun" and "The
Maven Owl")
I will now start a vote thread to decide the overall winner
(And hopef
At this point we have:
A with 2x1st pref, 1x2nd pref (or 3 any pref votes)
B with 5x1st pref, 1x2nd pref (or 6 any pref votes)
H with 10x1st pref, 2x2nd pref (or 12 any pref votes)
K with 4x1st pref, 5x2nd pref, 1x3rd pref (or 10 any pref votes)
The lowest by any measure is A, so I will eliminate
A had no transfers to promote
On 15 December 2014 at 10:28, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> At this point we have:
>
> A with 2x1st pref, 1x2nd pref (or 3 any pref votes)
> B with 5x1st pref, 1x2nd pref (or 6 any pref votes)
> H with 10x1st pref, 2x2nd pref (or 12 an
In Round 3, E only has 2nd preference votes (I could have eliminated E
earlier, but given the transfers it makes no difference to the result...) I
will now eliminate E and promote its preferences (which all go to K by the
way)
On 15 December 2014 at 10:21, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno..
D has less second preferences that the other elimination candidate: A
(based on votes of any preference) so eliminating D and promoting it's
preferences accordingly (IOW Michael O's 2nd pref for A now becomes a 1st
pref for A in round 3)
On 15 December 2014 at 10:16, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.ala
After counting the 21 votes cast. I am eliminating C, F, G, and L as there
is less than 3 votes between them and redistributing those votes would not
affect the position of any of C, F, G or L
Round 2 of the count will now proceed
On 15 December 2014 at 10:04, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conn
This poll is now closed. I will now proceed to count the votes and
votes received after this mail is sent will be excluded from the final count
On 9 December 2014 at 10:52, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This is a run-off vote to select the top two options for o
33 matches
Mail list logo
