Hello,
I'm using Maven 3.2.5 and I would like to use the Checkstyle plugin in the
newest version (6.3).
The default installation is 5.8, so how can I add the 6.3 version of the plugin
at my pom.xml and
use it on the check goal at the validate phase?
Thanks a lot
Phil
--
Hi.
We are prototyping following combination for our web site generation:
* maven-site-plugin 3.4
* doxia-module-markdown 1.6
* maven-fluido-skin 1.3.1
According to fluido documentation it has nice source code prettify
feature with line numbers. Alas, I didn't get it to work. Then I found
this bu
Thanks I have read these instructions, but check style uses the sun_checks.xml
I have add to my build section:
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-checkstyle-plugin
2.14
com.puppycrawl.tools
Hi,
apply
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-checkstyle-plugin/usage.html#Checking_for_Violations_as_Part_of_the_Build
and
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-checkstyle-plugin/examples/upgrading-checkstyle.html
Vincent
2015-02-13 21:28 GMT+01:00 Philipp Kraus :
> Hello,
>
> I'm using Mav
Hello,
I'm using Maven 3.2.5 and I would like to use the Checkstyle plugin in the
newest version (6.3).
The default installation is 5.8, so how can I add the 6.3 version of the plugin
at my pom.xml and
use it on the check goal at the validate phase?
I don’t found the correct pom entries to do t
Provide a sample project with what you expect as the result for a given project.
The dependency plugin does its own weird resolution and M2Eclipse also has its
own resolver (which is closer to what Maven actually does vs the dependency
plugin) and I don't really want to think about your descript
Hello everyone
I thought I knew how maven did dependency conflict resolution: always go with
the version that's closest to the base pom
However, it seems that is not the case. Here is my scenario
I have a pom of packaging=pom, call it A, which is the base where I execute
maven.
So this is my
Hi Curtis,
Thank you very much for your thoughtful reply. I'll review your links... very
curious
Thanks,
Viktor
--- Sent on go
> On 13/2/2015, at 17:33, Curtis Rueden wrote:
>
> Hi Viktor,
>
> > Do you actually consider this situation as a problem or is it just a
> > perfectionist talking to
Hi Viktor,
> Do you actually consider this situation as a problem or is it just a
> perfectionist talking to me? ;-)
I would say it is a very real challenge of managing projects with many
components.
> how would you approach determining those, which are required for final
> deliveries, and those
Good day,
I wonder if this community can provide some hints on handling the following.
At a few last projects I was asked to set (or clean) automated builds up,
so they can get (at least) deployable software package(s) after code
changes in a minimum time. Starting from the final desirable result
10 matches
Mail list logo