Re: Excluding -beta-N from a range

Thanks karl, the version range semantic is much clear now for me. -D On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 3:03 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > On 15/01/17 12:01, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 13/01/17 16:37, Benson Margulies wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at

Re: Excluding -beta-N from a range

On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > On 13/01/17 16:37, Benson Margulies wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Florian Schätz >> wrote: >>> >>> Am Donnerstag, den 12.01.2017, 14:22 -0800 schrieb Benson Margulies:

Re: Excluding -beta-N from a range

Hi, On 15/01/17 12:01, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi, On 13/01/17 16:37, Benson Margulies wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Florian Schätz wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 12.01.2017, 14:22 -0800 schrieb Benson Margulies: I agree with them that this is

Re: Excluding -beta-N from a range

Hi, On 13/01/17 16:37, Benson Margulies wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Florian Schätz wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 12.01.2017, 14:22 -0800 schrieb Benson Margulies: I agree with them that this is counter-intuitive. The whole point of -beta-1 is to introduce new,