Alexander Kriegisch wrote:
> I think what Nils says applies internationally, not just in the NL. A
> copyright claim for any project which sports at least one easily
> discoverable licence file in its SCM and in each major artifact should
> be easy to defend against any licence violations.
I think what Nils says applies internationally, not just in the NL. A
copyright claim for any project which sports at least one easily
discoverable licence file in its SCM and in each major artifact should
be easy to defend against any licence violations. Legally, redundant
copies are totally
Timothy Stone wrote:
> Organizationally, we lack a policy and much of our code lacks even a
> "copyright."
Where I live (The Netherlands) there is no need to explicitly add a copyright
notice to the work you create, you automatically have the copyright on anything
you create (not just
Sat, 30 Mar 2024, /Debraj Manna/:
As suggested by Stanimir if I remove the test-jar type and also the
includes like below then mvn package --projects=:agent -T 2 --also-make
works
[...]
But if I add back the below inclusion it again starts throwing the
NoClassDefFoundError
[...]
At least
