RE: Re: Ladies and Gents...does Continuum actually work?

2006-07-04 Thread John Allen
This aspect of continuum is one of the main reasons we dropped it in favour of luntbuild. An 'exclusion pattern' feaure might be a good idea as it would enable 'smarter' checkout and avoid checking out sub-directories containing pom.xml files (for instance). Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 14:03:15

Re: Proximity forum

2006-06-28 Thread John Allen
DNS not resolving; is it just me? Tamás Cservenák t.cservenak at gmail.com writes: there is a forum set up for Proximity users/developers on www.abstracthorizon.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: [m2] Anyone using Luntbuild?

2006-04-25 Thread John Allen
We are using luntbuild and maven 2extensively. IMHO its one of the best freebies out there. - Original Message - From: Rolf Strijdhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Maven Users List users@maven.apache.org Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 7:01 PM Subject: Re: [m2] Anyone using Luntbuild? Hi I

Re: Problem with Cobertura

2006-03-26 Thread John Allen
Cobertura's m2 support is flakey. Maybe its been fixed. See previous posts for background - Original Message - From: Arnaud Bailly [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Maven Users List users@maven.apache.org Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 12:27 PM Subject: Re: Problem with Cobertura The current

Re: Clover Plugin

2006-03-26 Thread John Allen
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCLOVER-23 John Allen commented on MCLOVER-23: --- I completely agree with the principal but think the approach adopted by checkstyle and PMD for custom resource resolution should be adopted:- A resource (in this case

Re: [m2] multi-project problems

2006-03-22 Thread John Allen
except reports, there is no way of setting standard reports or a common configuration for them in parent projects (ie there is no reportingManagement) which results in quite a bit of duplication in leaf projects. John - Original Message - From: Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: [m2] multi-project problems

2006-03-22 Thread John Allen
I have tried to use the cobertura plugin for reporting and goverance enforcement but im afraid its a none starter, when run in reactor builds you get a 'can not overwrite readonly parameter testClassPathElements' (or alike) when generating sites and the check goal fails to interoperate with

maven-proxy and NTLM HTTP proxies (corporate environments)

2006-02-24 Thread John Allen
See http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENPROXY-42 for a maven-proxy patch that provides native NTLM proxy support. Alt. use NTLMAPS as previously suggested. - Original Message - From: Dave Hoffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Maven Users List users@maven.apache.org Sent: Friday, February 24,

[m2] m2eclipse plugin: reporting compilation errors

2006-02-15 Thread John Allen
Sounds dumb i know but how do i get the the m2eclipse plugin to actually report whats failed in compilation failures, you know line numbers et al? mvn.bat results in:- [DEBUG] D:\Aelitis\projects\examples\utils\aelitis-utils-xml\src\main\java Compiling 1 source file to

Re: [m202] Cobertura plugin

2006-02-03 Thread John Allen
I've also given up on cobertura for now due to problems trying to get it to work as part of my 'standards confirmance' build that uses cobertura:check and the site build (fails in site build complaining of trying to write to a read only testClasspath or alike). Clover works fine in this regard

RE: Assembly plugin triggers execution of all previous phases

2005-12-16 Thread John Allen
to the code where I can turn it off. Then I'll copy it, name it decoupled-assembly and use it. This way I can use assembly only in one phase which is executed after package. And I need to use it in two phases. Thanks, Filip. John Allen wrote: As I stated before it is different because

RE: Assembly plugin triggers execution of all previous phases

2005-12-15 Thread John Allen
execution of all previous phases This doesn't make sense. If I remember correctly, assembly is a part od package phase in default lifecycle. And why is assembly plugin behaviour different from all other plugins(coupled with lifecycle phase)? In my opinion this breaks lifecycle main purpose. John

RE: [m2] Links from parent site to module site

2005-12-15 Thread John Allen
Re your layout, that's not a problem. If you are using the correct version of the plugin (i.e. the patches have been applied) then specify ${modules} in your site.xml:- ?xml version=1.0 encoding=${outputEncoding}? project name=${project.name} bannerLeft name${project.name}/name

RE: [m2] can't read url exception

2005-12-15 Thread John Allen
I've also had this but intermittently, usually occurred when I'm behind a hideously slow NTLM proxy but not always. -Original Message- From: Edwin Punzalan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 December 2005 02:01 To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: [m2] can't read url exception Which

Re: Assembly plugin triggers execution of all previous phases

2005-12-14 Thread John Allen
assembly plugin is differenct to other lifecycle cooperating plugins in as much as it invokes the package lifecyle before running. if you have configured assembly to be part of package phase itself you will loop forever. the idea is mvn assembly:assembly will do all the work of building an

m2 supporting maven-proxy

2005-12-09 Thread John Allen
Has anyone get a latest snapshot build of maven-proxy? i dont wat to install m1 and go through the hassle of building it myself so was hoping i could just lift someone else build. Thanks, John

[m2] howto turn arbitrary files into artifacts and reuse them in other projects

2005-12-05 Thread John Allen
Hi, Anyone know how I might access arbitrary files maintained by one project in another project without having the 'source' project available? Are there any ways of providing this kind of arbitrary file/artifact packaging, distribution and unpacking functionality? Note the files i wish to

RE: variable references for site generation

2005-11-21 Thread John Allen
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-661 provides a simple patch which provides parent and module links using the project URLs which as you correctly point out only work when the site is deployed. -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 November 2005