Cheers Dan!!
just works as expected with 2.11.
Just wondering why I'm so quick to upgrade to newer versions sometimes...
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/maven-surefire-plugin-Issue-with-Dtest-param-under-Windows-tp5518723p5521282.html
Sent from the Maven -
maven-help-plugin:2.1.1:active-profiles doesn't display some active profiles
under a specific set of circumstances:
- a parent pom containing a set of profiles, let's say 'dev' and 'prod'
- a settings.xml that activates a locally defined plugin (let's call it
'repo'), and also activates the
I'm having an issue with 'mvn test -Dtest=testClassName'
It works fine under Linux and OsX but under Windows the test is simply not
found.
I'm using latest TestNG.
Any clue on what the problem could be?
--
View this message in context:
-Original Message-
From: nodje [mailto:[hidden email]
/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=5509501i=1]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 12:23 AM
To: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=5509501i=2
Subject: Re: [maven-site-plugin] trouble migrating from 3.0-beta3 to 3.0,
bug?
Hum, I
apache email.
cheers
Olivier Lamy [via Maven] wrote:
Hello,
Do you have a sample project to reproduce that ?
2012/2/22 nodje [hidden email]
/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=5505481i=0:
migration form 2.x to 3.0-betax wasn't much of a problem, but since
then, I
had to release components
=pluginorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.0
strategy = org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.strategy.SelfFirstStrategy
urls[0] =
file:/Users/nodje/.m2/repository/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-site-plugin/3.0/maven-site-plugin-3.0.jar
urls[1] =
file:/Users/nodje/.m2/repository/org/apache/maven/reporting/maven
Hi Ron,
I've been reading quite some of your posts in the forum, and it actually
changed my mind about deployment configuration. Enlightening indeed.
I would now try to favor a single artifact deployment that could be
configured externally - say JNDi, this really makes sense.
That said, I
Hi,
I'm facing a problem in the release process when running Integration Tests.
We have different profiles for the different environments the release is
made for, namely DEV, TEST, PROD.
Each profile has its own values for DB access.
Now the IT are made to work on the development environment,
Invaluable piece of information Ron, thanks a lot.
I've been searching the archives without success, with 'profile plugin'
'failsafe profile', all woudn't yield much relevant results.
But I'd still be happy if you could point me to some efficient keywords to
search for.
I don't remember JNDI as
Hi,
we've been using a definition of scm located in our company parent pom:
scm
connectionscm:svn:${svn.root}/trunk/${artifactId}/connection
developerConnectionscm:svn:${svn.root}/trunk/${artifactId}/developerConnection
url${svn.root}/trunk/${artifactId}/url
/scm
This used to work
I've been using the standard configuration described in
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-failsafe-plugin/usage.html to be able
to execute integration tests.
That is, jetty:run-exploded goal is link to pre-integration-test phase in
order to have a container to run integration test against.
Hi Stephen,
I like your second post ;)
One the other hand it probably means that you already know that pestering
jetty plugin people won't help!
still, it's frustrating to see some phase triggered more than what is
needed.
I guess i have better things to do than trying to perfect something
adding another intermediary parent pom, (something like
all-parent-jdk1.5) to see if it would propagate the jar plugin config as
expected.
cheers
/nodje
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Need-help-to-find-best-way-to-recompile-complete-project-and-dep-with-1-5-tp4413579p4413579
appended to the inherited scm url
-Stephen
2009/12/3 nodje nodje...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I'm using maven-release-plugin 2.0-beta9 and I'm still getting scm urls
rewritten at each deployment.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-231 is been closed quite a while
ago, so many we're
Hi,
I'm using maven-release-plugin 2.0-beta9 and I'm still getting scm urls
rewritten at each deployment.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-231 is been closed quite a while
ago, so many we're not speaking about the same rewriting.
The way we use the SCM tag in our organization is trough
]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] Cannot get the revision information from the scm repository :
Exception while executing SCM command.
svn: '/Users/nodje/Documents/project
://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-2533
2009/8/25 nodje nodje...@gmail.com:
I got an error using 1.0-beta-3 with svnjava:
[INFO] [buildnumber:create {execution: default}]
[INFO] Change the default 'svn' provider implementation to 'javasvn'.
[INFO] Checking for local modifications: skipped.
[INFO
I'm trying to make use of context.xml with the Tomcat Maven Plugin.
Whether I use tomcat:run or tomcat:deploy, it invariably deploys to a
context based on the pom's artifactId an not to the context path specified
in the webapps/META-INF/context.xml.
Has anyone met the issue?
--
View this
Hi,
I'm trying to get a single test configuration for all projects and as such
I'm trying to put this piece of config in a parent pom:
suiteXmlFiles
suiteXmlFilesrc/test/testng.xml/suiteXmlFile
/suiteXmlFiles
But it doesn't seem
Hi Olivier,
I got an error following the update of builnumber-maven-plugin
1.0-beta-3-SNAPSHOT:
[INFO] Error building POM (may not be this project's POM).
Project ID: org.codehaus.mojo:buildnumber-maven-plugin
Reason: Failed to build model from file
'/Users/nodje/.m2/repository/org/codehaus
/execution
In this case, the source and javadoc artifacts are created, but they won't
be installed in the local repo nor will they be deployed.
Why is that?
-nodje
nodje wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to limit the creation of Sources and Javadoc jars to goals only
after install.
Currently
/
2009/4/17 nodje nodje...@gmail.com:
Olivier,
i'm getting those log lines for each mavengoal invoked:
[WARNING] Attempting to build MavenProject instance for Artifact
(org.codehaus.mojo:buildnumber-maven-plugin:1.0-beta-3-20090414.214556-8) of
type: maven-plugin; constructing POM artifact
a bit on this please?
thanks
-nodje
2009/4/14 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org:
2009/4/14 nodje nodje...@gmail.com:
Hi Olivier,
it does actually help! It works in IDEA now.
But if it can filter the ${timestamp}, it doesn't work anymore for
${buildNumber}:
[INFO] [buildnumber:create
It works fine now, thanks a lot!
-nodje
2009/4/14 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org:
2009/4/14 nodje nodje...@gmail.com:
Hi Olivier,
it does actually help! It works in IDEA now.
But if it can filter the ${timestamp}, it doesn't work anymore for
${buildNumber}:
[INFO] [buildnumber:create
that are used only for
creating WAR to deploy, and that's perfect here. People should be able to learn
to do that outside of IDEA.
thanks
-nodje
because executing mojos directly never invokes the lifecycle.
you could have a profile with a default goal of validate and with the
plugins you want bound
/phase is included in the
plugin.
-nodje
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Linking-source---javadoc-plugin-to-install-phase---limitation--tp2626903p2626903.html
Sent from the maven users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Thanks for the info Stephen. I didn't expected a new release of SVN so soon!
SVNKIT's probably gonna solve the problem.
Changing the SVN CLI's not gonna help anyway, and as far as I'm concerned no
Macport available for 1.6 yet! I'll be watching that.
cheers
2009/4/13 nodje nodje...@gmail.com
the latest version of the plugin:
[INFO] [buildnumber:create {execution: default}]
[INFO] Checking for local modifications: skipped.
[INFO] Updating project files from SCM: skipped.
[INFO] Executing: /bin/sh -c cd /Users/nodje/Documents/project/company/project
svn --non-interactive info
[INFO] Working
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com wrote:
I may be wrong, but i think finalName is constructed early in the
cycle and therefor buildNumber var is not propagate properly, does
maven 2.1.0 help?
No, the problem is that since Nodje is executing jetty plugin directly
rather
it seems Jetty isn't aware of the ${buildNumber} variable when it check the
name of the war it has to deploy.
Did anyone successfully use both plugin together?
cheers
-nodje
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Using-buildnumber-maven-plugin-together-with-jetty-plugin
This seems to have been fixed in 2.1.0 (cf.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2562) but I can't find any information on
how this has actually been implemented.
How can I have access to this property?
thanks!
-nodje
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Getting-timestamp
A month later, I'm still confronting the same problem...
Is there anything obvious I'm missing here?
Am I the only one trying to figure this out?
:-/
nodje wrote:
Sorry for not being clear.
What I mean is that the regular way Maven checks for updates on SNAPSHOT
dependencies doesn't
hum, still no one about this?
It'd really help to solve the issue though.
nodje
nodje wrote:
Sorry for not being clear.
What I mean is that the regular way Maven checks for updates on SNAPSHOT
dependencies doesn't apply to parent-pom SNAPSHOT.
If you have a project with a parent-pom 1
Hi,
it seemed to work at first, but now we get the main/resources filtered by
the test/filters.
We have to revert on naming properties differently :(
-nodje
Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
As we have an it test [1] which test this and works, it should :-)
--
Olivier
[1]
https
Is http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRESOURCES the right place to submit the
issue?
As for the test case, what about a pom.xml with the minimal directory
structure and a couple of properties files and filters. Can I update that on
Jira?
-nodje
Olivier Lamy wrote:
Can you load an issue
doesn't seem to appear in the mailing list.
Explanation welcome!!
-nodje
Wayne Fay wrote:
In other words, it seems there is no update checks on the remote repo for
the parent version in a child project.
Is that an expected behavior? If not, is there a bug filled alreay for
that?
Is there any
the latest version.
In other words, it seems there is no update checks on the remote repo for
the parent version in a child project.
Is that an expected behavior? If not, is there a bug filled alreay for that?
Is there any workaround ?
cheers
nodje
--
View this message in context:
http
I'm running into the exact same problem.
I'd be really convenient to be able to keep the same properties name.
Could someone confirm this is a problem or the expected behavior?
Is there any workaround? apart from renaming properties?
cheers
-nodje
rundmsef wrote:
If you are attempting
it should only
specify the default version to use when you include the plugin in your pom
and not add the plugin to each every Maven project. But it seems it does.
I'm gonna try the 2.3 version then. Is it supposed to work with this one?
-nodje
olamy wrote:
Hi,
Which version of the resources
-style)
[INFO]
[INFO] [release:prepare]
[INFO] Verifying that there are no local modifications...
[INFO] Executing: svn --non-interactive status
[INFO] Working directory:
/Users/nodje/Documents/Project/company/company-parent-1
[INFO
...
[INFO] Executing: svn --non-interactive status
[INFO] Working directory:
/Users/nodje/Documents/project/company/commons-xml-1.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] Checking dependencies and plugins for snapshots ...
There are still some remaining snapshot dependencies.: Do you want to
resolve them now? (yes
...
[INFO] Executing: svn --non-interactive status
[INFO] Working directory:
/Users/nodje/Documents/project/company/commons-xml-1.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] Checking dependencies and plugins for snapshots ...
There are still some remaining snapshot dependencies.: Do you want to
resolve them now? (yes
I'm currently having the same problem as below. Not migrating from ant
though, but I need to be able to filter different set of properties having
the same name.
I don't think it's possible to affect a specific filter to a chosen
resource.
To illustrate, let's say you have two instances of an
mvn archetype:generate produce the same error.
Could it have something to do with the velocity-1.5.pom that it doesn't
find?
nodje wrote:
Sorry didn't pay attention to that.
But the result is exactly the same with generate anyway.
Looks like you don't have the problem, so it's probably
of create ?
create goal is deprecated as far as I know.
Marc.
nodje a écrit :
What's with the archetype:create?
I suddenly get this error when trying to create a new project:
mvn archetype:create -DgroupId=com.company.commons -DartifactId=xml
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO
dependency on commons-lang
-nodje
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Archetype%3Acreate-broken--tp17503659p17503659.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
,
-nodje
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/dependency%3Asources%2C-dependency%3Ajavadoctp16392437s177p16392437.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
, nodje [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to get a project dependencies' javadoc jars?
I expected something quite simple in the line of the dependency-plugin
goal
'dependency:sources' but it lokks like there's nothing to get the
javadocs
along the sources.
What would be the best
I'd like to make sure all developers have a project dependencies' javadocs
sources at disposal in their private repository.
Can I modify the dependency:resolve default behavior to achieve this?
NB: it mustn't be linked to a Maven lifecycle goal.
--nodje
--
View this message in context:
http
I assumed Maven was resolving dependencies using the plugin goal 'resolve'.
If so, what would be a better place to tell Maven to fetch sources along
with the libraries?
Otherwise can a call to dependency:sources be added somewhere in the
lifecycle?
-nodje
Brian E Fox wrote
-tags instead of just /tags. Every build goes to build-tags
automatically. When a release occurs, we move the tag to release tags
and delete the other build tags.
-Original Message-
From: nodje [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 11:05 PM
To: users
instead of tag?
thanks for any feedback, I'm a little bit lost here :)
--nodje
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Release-cycle---Maven-release-plugin-usability-tp16296781s177p16296781.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
. there was a big fubar with
1.2.3-TEST-1, so we're going again then you have 1.2.3-TEST-2)
When you are finally ready to roll you just go
1.2.3-TEST-x - 1.2.3
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 7:36 AM, nodje [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not 100% sure it's the right forum to ask question about
on a fresh Windows installation.
Fresh installation downloaded many artifacts, but ended up with the same
error.
I'm lost here. Is there anything else I can try. Something obvious I haven't
check?
Or is there really a problem with the main repo?
--nodje
--
View this message in context:
http
help Brian.
Brian E Fox wrote:
We need more info to help. What plugin artifact is missing? Paste the
relevant part of your log output.
-Original Message-
From: nodje [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 2:47 AM
To: users@maven.apache.org
Subject
by the release plugin's prepare goal.
I don't think it's necessary to overwrite this config information.
Why is that so?
Is there anyway to avoid this? I don't see any option allowing to do this.
--nodje
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Release-plugin-overwrite-%3Cscm%3E-config
plugin: what's the difference between
2.0 and 2.0.2? and what's new in 2.1-alpha?
cheers
--nodje
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Maven-plugin-version-and-information-tp15750775s177p15750775.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
haven't found anything on the subject.
Has anyone encountered the same issue?
cheers,
--nodje
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Maven-Resources-Plugin-Windows-path-%5C%5C-parsing-problem-tp15449734s177p15449734.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive
[1] as does the
other one [2]
Hth,
Nick Stolwijk
[1] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/classworlds/classworlds/1.1-alpha-2/
[2]
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-container-default/1.0-alpha-8/
nodje nodje wrote:
i'm probably the nth guy to ask this, but I'm
i'm probably the nth guy to ask this, but I'm totally new to maven and
barely understand it:
i cannot 'mvn test', I get:
[INFO] Error to resolving surefire provider dependency: Missing:
--
1) classworlds:classworlds:jar:1.1-alpha-2
Try downloading the file manually from the project
60 matches
Mail list logo