AW: AW: [mvn] bad artifacs returned

2012-07-05 Thread Stadelmann Josef
Wayne the answer is simple; look at http://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=org/opensaml/opensaml/2.2.3/opensaml-2.2.3.pom and see how opensaml's dependency on xalan is defined. That is to say if I get you right ::: if I have a dependency on opensaml I need to exclude in my project

AW: AW: [mvn] bad artifacs returned

2012-07-05 Thread Stadelmann Josef
: AW: [mvn] bad artifacs returned Wayne the answer is simple; look at http://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=org/opensaml/opensaml/2.2.3/opensaml-2.2.3.pom and see how opensaml's dependency on xalan is defined. That is to say if I get you right ::: if I have a dependency on opensaml I

AW: AW: [mvn] bad artifacs returned

2012-07-04 Thread Stadelmann Josef
Ron I would not say that - because I just found out that the artifact org/apache/rampart/rampart-project/1.6.2/rampart-project-1.6.1.pom has the following snippet in it. AND My project so far depends on this artifact and it comes from apache ! Now I will check if I can make it without this

AW: AW: [mvn] bad artifacs returned

2012-07-04 Thread Stadelmann Josef
And opensaml-2.2.3.pom has a reference as well repositories repository idshibboleth.internet2.edu/id nameInternet2/name layoutdefault/layout urlhttp://shibboleth.internet2.edu/downloads/maven2/url snapshots

Re: AW: AW: [mvn] bad artifacs returned

2012-07-04 Thread Ron Wheeler
That is why one should not put repo definitions in poms. The people at fault are the opensaml authors. It is also why you mirror ALL references to repos that Maven makes so that they all go to your repo manager and then your repo manager will decide what external repos should be consulted.