I have also been annoyed with what you describe, and have wondered how
to fill the gap of missing coverage.
Outside of copying the testcase and dynamically changing the log level
inside of it, which in addition to being burdensome, also offends my
DRY sensibility, the best idea I've had about
tested class with INFO traces activated:*
-Message d'origine-
De : paulus.benedic...@gmail.com [mailto:paulus.benedic...@gmail.com]
De
la part de Paul Benedict
Envoyé : mercredi 12 février 2014 21:36
À : Maven Users List
Objet : Re: Code coverage with debug logs: 100
: paulus.benedic...@gmail.com [mailto:
paulus.benedic...@gmail.com]
De
la part de Paul Benedict
Envoyé : mercredi 12 février 2014 21:36
À : Maven Users List
Objet : Re: Code coverage with debug logs: 100% branch coverage not
possible?...
IIRC, there should be an option in Emma
: paulus.benedic...@gmail.com [mailto:
paulus.benedic...@gmail.com]
De
la part de Paul Benedict
Envoyé : mercredi 12 février 2014 21:36
À : Maven Users List
Objet : Re: Code coverage with debug logs: 100% branch coverage not
possible?...
IIRC, there should be an option in Emma
: paulus.benedic...@gmail.com [mailto:
paulus.benedic...@gmail.com]
De la part de Paul Benedict Envoyé : mercredi 12 février 2014 21:36 À : Maven
Users List Objet : Re: Code coverage with debug logs: 100% branch coverage
not possible?... IIRC, there should be an option in Emma/Cobertura that
allows you
Hi all,
I need your opinion/way to tackle the following problem:
In many projects we use a Logger (doesnt matter which implementation). It
is often recommend to test if the debug level is activated before logging a
debug trace like the following:
if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
IIRC, there should be an option in Emma/Cobertura that allows you to
exclude coverage on certain classes. So if you can exclude your log4j
classes (you don't really want to test your logging, do you?), then you
should be able to raise your percentage.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Benoît
To follow up on Paul's answer, I would go as far as to say that I test my
code in order to feel comfortable that it actually does what it should do.
Thus, I can very well live with 90% coverage if I know what the missing 10%
are rather than testing for the sake of making a good impression with a
[mailto:paulus.benedic...@gmail.com] De la
part de Paul Benedict
Envoyé : mercredi 12 février 2014 21:36
À : Maven Users List
Objet : Re: Code coverage with debug logs: 100% branch coverage not
possible?...
IIRC, there should be an option in Emma/Cobertura that allows you to exclude
coverage on certain classes. So
List
Objet : Re: Code coverage with debug logs: 100% branch coverage not
possible?...
IIRC, there should be an option in Emma/Cobertura that allows you to
exclude coverage on certain classes. So if you can exclude your log4j
classes (you don't really want to test your logging, do you
2014 21:47
À : Maven Users List
Objet : Re: Code coverage with debug logs: 100% branch coverage not
possible?...
To follow up on Paul's answer, I would go as far as to say that I test my
code in order to feel comfortable that it actually does what it should do.
Thus, I can very well live with 90
With the pictures attached
De : Benoît Berthonneau [mailto:ben...@berthonneau.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 12 février 2014 21:57
À : 'Maven Users List'
Objet : RE: Code coverage with debug logs: 100% branch coverage not
possible?...
Hi Paul,
Don't think that I could play with exclusions
: paulus.benedic...@gmail.com [mailto:paulus.benedic...@gmail.com] De
la part de Paul Benedict
Envoyé : mercredi 12 février 2014 21:36
À : Maven Users List
Objet : Re: Code coverage with debug logs: 100% branch coverage not
possible?...
IIRC, there should be an option in Emma/Cobertura that allows
de Paul Benedict
Envoyé : mercredi 12 février 2014 21:36
À : Maven Users List
Objet : Re: Code coverage with debug logs: 100% branch coverage not
possible?...
IIRC, there should be an option in Emma/Cobertura that allows you to
exclude coverage on certain classes. So if you can exclude your log4j
[mailto:paulus.benedic...@gmail.com] De
la part de Paul Benedict
Envoyé : mercredi 12 février 2014 21:36
À : Maven Users List
Objet : Re: Code coverage with debug logs: 100% branch coverage not
possible?...
IIRC, there should be an option in Emma/Cobertura that allows you to
exclude coverage on certain
15 matches
Mail list logo
