Declaring "upstream-library" with scope "runtime" in the
dependencyManagement section of "my-project" should do it. However, I don't
see the real benefit of going through this hassle.
/Anders
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Nick Stolwijk
wrote:
> But I think that he
But I think that he wants it transitive, but only at runtime scope instead
of compile time.
I also wondered a while ago if this was possible. It would be nice to keep
clean projects clean. (As in, declared all compile time dependencies
instead of relying on transitive compile time dependencies.)
So you could have scope=compile=true (which means the dep is
non-transitive)
On Wed 27 Dec 2017 at 00:26, Andy Feldman wrote:
> On Dec 26, 2017 11:34, "Stephen Connolly" >
> wrote:
>
> On Sun 24 Dec 2017 at 18:01, Andy Feldman
On Dec 26, 2017 11:34, "Stephen Connolly"
wrote:
On Sun 24 Dec 2017 at 18:01, Andy Feldman wrote:
> Assuming I have a dependency relationship of "my-project -> my-library ->
> upstream-library", with each dependency in compile scope, I
On Sun 24 Dec 2017 at 18:01, Andy Feldman wrote:
> Assuming I have a dependency relationship of "my-project -> my-library ->
> upstream-library", with each dependency in compile scope, I know that
> my-project transitively picks up a compile scope dependency on
>
Assuming I have a dependency relationship of "my-project -> my-library ->
upstream-library", with each dependency in compile scope, I know that
my-project transitively picks up a compile scope dependency on
upstream-library. Reading the documentation at