Re: How to prevent deployment on release

2009-12-10 Thread Adam Leggett (UPCO)
I believe its the default release profile that triggers the site deployment stuff. There is an option for setting custom ones on the perform mojo: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-release-plugin/perform-mojo.html#releaseProfiles On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 09:25 -0500, Jim Collings wrote: The

Re: How to prevent deployment on release

2009-12-10 Thread Olivier Lamy
You can configure used goals with this : http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-release-plugin/perform-mojo.html#goals 2009/12/10 Jim Collings jlistn...@gmail.com: The objective is to prevent maven's attempt at site deployment. Everything else, though, I want. Problem is that when I use the xml

Re: How to prevent deployment on release

2009-12-10 Thread Jim Collings
I believe the only difference here is that this is a property and I am using xml but I imagine it is the same thing. On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: You can configure used goals with this :

Re: How to prevent deployment on release

2009-12-10 Thread Jim Collings
How complicated is that to do? We don't generally use profiles around here so I've little experience with them. On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Adam Leggett (UPCO) adam.legg...@upco.co.uk wrote: I believe its the default release profile that triggers the site deployment stuff. There is an

Re: How to prevent deployment on release

2009-12-10 Thread Adam Leggett (UPCO)
Not massively complicated, have a look at the responses to this query about a similar issue. In this case a need to prevent deploying the sources jar as part of a release. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/437085/mvn-releaseperform-without-source-ending-up-in-artifactory On Thu, 2009-12-10 at

Re: How to prevent deployment on release

2009-12-10 Thread Jim Collings
Aw crud. Thanks for your help guys but this turned out to be a case of developer headspace and timing. ;-) I forgot that I had to call maven:prepare first. My assumption at the time was that it would be called by maven:perform if it was required. Not the case though. Works great now. Jim C.