Site, deployment url and inheritance

2012-07-02 Thread Grégory Joseph
Hi there, I've seen this topic debated many times, and still haven't figured everything out. I was recently confused by the handling and inheritance of urls in Maven. I think I got most of it, when it comes to project.url. Now, when it comes to deploying a site, I'm baffled. Up to

Re: Site, deployment url and inheritance

2012-07-02 Thread Lukas Theussl
Grégory Joseph wrote: Hi there, I've seen this topic debated many times, and still haven't figured everything out. I was recently confused by the handling and inheritance of urls in Maven. I think I got most of it, when it comes to project.url. Now, when it comes to deploying a site,

Re: Site, deployment url and inheritance

2012-07-02 Thread Grégory Joseph
Hi Lukas, On 2 July 2012 13:18, Lukas Theussl ltheu...@apache.org wrote: Grégory Joseph wrote: It kind of sounds like MSITE-600 to me, so I'm unsure if/how the issue was fixed. Example: * Corporate parent pom defines this site deployment url: prot://foo/${artifactId}/${version} -- it works

Re: Site, deployment url and inheritance

2012-07-02 Thread Grégory Joseph
Just tried staging, and indeed, the paths in that case are correct* - but again, I'm assuming that's because the normalization is done and supported by my local FS ? -g * with the strange bug that https://nexus.domain.org/xyz; was converted to targetstaging/http/s.domain.org/xyz ... On 2 July

Re: Site, deployment url and inheritance

2012-07-02 Thread Lukas Theussl
Grégory Joseph wrote: Just tried staging, and indeed, the paths in that case are correct* - but again, I'm assuming that's because the normalization is done and supported by my local FS ? IIRC normalization is done by the wagon you are using for the deploy, so it's outside the realm of the

Re: Site, deployment url and inheritance

2012-07-02 Thread Grégory Joseph
On 2 July 2012 14:38, Lukas Theussl ltheu...@apache.org wrote: Grégory Joseph wrote: Just tried staging, and indeed, the paths in that case are correct* - I take it back. Staging was fine… with 2.1.1. With 3.1 I get this, for example for last module of the multi-module build [INFO] Pushing