RE: maven unit tests run twice

2008-11-11 Thread EJ Ciramella
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 4:52 PM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: maven unit tests run twice EJ Ciramella schrieb: > When I run "mvn install site", the unit tests run twice. > > I've tried all different combinations of the things

RE: maven unit tests run twice

2008-11-11 Thread Orford, Ian
ember 2008 22:13 To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: maven unit tests run twice You should use report-only report. Which version of maven-report-plugin are you using? Before 2.4, report-only wasn't existing. Cheers. 2008/11/8 EJ Ciramella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > When I run "mvn insta

Re: maven unit tests run twice

2008-11-09 Thread Baptiste MATHUS
You should use report-only report. Which version of maven-report-plugin are you using? Before 2.4, report-only wasn't existing. Cheers. 2008/11/8 EJ Ciramella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > When I run "mvn install site", the unit tests run twice. > > I've tried all d

Re: maven unit tests run twice

2008-11-09 Thread Karsten Ohme
EJ Ciramella schrieb: > When I run "mvn install site", the unit tests run twice. > > I've tried all different combinations of the things talked about here: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-257 > > But no matter what I do, they run twice - halp?

maven unit tests run twice

2008-11-08 Thread EJ Ciramella
When I run "mvn install site", the unit tests run twice. I've tried all different combinations of the things talked about here: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-257 But no matter what I do, they run twice - halp?!

RE: Unit tests run twice ?

2003-11-26 Thread Brett Porter
Let's get rid of it altogether :) Its got nothing to do with the project any more. - Brett > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 27 November 2003 1:57 PM > To: Maven Users List > Subject: RE: Unit tests run twice

RE: Unit tests run twice ?

2003-11-26 Thread dion
Yes, let's encapsulate the plugin communications into tags rather than script. Once we have that, lets make project's getPluginContext method private. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 27/11/2003 08

RE: Unit tests run twice ?

2003-11-26 Thread Brett Porter
> >A better alternative should be : > > > > > > > > > How am i supposed to change the maven.test.skip variable > between the two > lines above ? > I've just tried to add a value="true"> but it > doesn't work. You shouldn't need to. In this case, test should only be attained once. But I haven

Re: Unit tests run twice ?

2003-11-26 Thread Eric Berenguier
Hi Brett, Brett Porter wrote: Unfortunately the maven:pluginVar tag is read only, but you can probably do this: ${pom.getPluginContext('maven-test-plugin').setVariable('maven.test.skip', This one works. Thanks ! A better alternative should be : How am i supposed to change the maven.test.

RE: Unit tests run twice ?

2003-11-25 Thread Brett Porter
antee either work :) Cheers, Brett > -Original Message- > From: Eric Berenguier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, 26 November 2003 2:25 AM > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: Unit tests run twice ? > > > Sri Sankaran wrote: > > >

Re: Unit tests run twice ?

2003-11-25 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Eric Berenguier wrote: Sri Sankaran wrote: Have you tried Still doesn't work. I don't think scope="parent" is even needed there... (if I don't mistake there's even no parent scope) Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE

Re: Unit tests run twice ?

2003-11-25 Thread Eric Berenguier
Sri Sankaran wrote: Have you tried Still doesn't work. Eric - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Unit tests run twice ?

2003-11-25 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Eric Berenguier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 25 November 2003 16:14 > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: Unit tests run twice ? > > > > > >>> > > I tried that too, but it doesn't work (t

Re: Unit tests run twice ?

2003-11-25 Thread Eric Berenguier
I tried that too, but it doesn't work (test are still run twice). As far i understand, properties can't be changed after being set, and the test plugin sets this to false. So the only way to change this property is to run "maven -Dmaven.test.skip=true myGoal " (or put this in a build.pr

RE: Unit tests run twice ?

2003-11-25 Thread Sri Sankaran
Have you tried Sri -Original Message- From: Eric Berenguier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 9:53 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: Unit tests run twice ? Tomasz Pik wrote: > Maybe this help (sorry, not tes

Re: Unit tests run twice ?

2003-11-25 Thread Eric Berenguier
Tomasz Pik wrote: Maybe this help (sorry, not tested): Thanks for your answer, I tried that too, but it doesn't work (test are still run twice). Eric - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

RE: Unit tests run twice ?

2003-11-25 Thread Sri Sankaran
, 2003 9:12 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: Unit tests run twice ? Eric Berenguier wrote: > Hi, Hi, Maybe this help (sorry, not tested): > I'd like to write a single goal that install jar to repository and > produce the maven site: > So i wrote so

Re: Unit tests run twice ?

2003-11-25 Thread Paul Libbrecht
est goal, so i have my unit tests run twice. It's a real problem when unit tests take a long time to run. Am i missing something ? Eric Berenguier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional comm

Re: Unit tests run twice ?

2003-11-25 Thread Tomasz Pik
have my unit tests run twice. It's a real problem when unit tests take a long time to run. Am i missing something ? Eric Berenguier Tomek - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-ma

Unit tests run twice ?

2003-11-25 Thread Eric Berenguier
Hi, I'd like to write a single goal that install jar to repository and produce the maven site: So i wrote something like this : It works but both jar:install and site:generate call the test:test goal, so i have my unit tests run twice. It's a real problem when unit tests t