Hi all
I should preface this all by saying that I am not an experienced maven
user, though I would not describe myself as a complete newbie, so I
won't be too surprised if I am just doing something stupid here. Please
let me know if this is the wrong group for this type of question.
I've
Why not have it included in maven central. This is quite easy for open
source projects and much more practical for your users. See
https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/Sonatype+OSS+Maven+Repository+Usage+Guide
Kind regards,
Joachim
On 03/05/2014 09:23 PM, Howard wrote:
Hi all
I
You should be using a real repository manager instead. There are several
free or cheap hosting options.
/Anders
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Howard how...@renci.org wrote:
Hi all
I should preface this all by saying that I am not an experienced maven
user, though I would not describe
Dnia 5 marzec 2014 o 21:23 Howard how...@renci.org napisa?(a):
[...]
For reference here's the part of the pom that is trying to download the
jar:
dependency
groupIdorg.renci.databridge-util/groupId
artifactIddatabridge-util/artifactId
version1.0-BETA/version
Thanks Rafa!
That was in fact the answer. Well, I did admit it was likely something
stupid. :)
Thanks also to Anders and Joachim for answering. I will definitely
think about hosting our jars at maven central. I didn't realize it was
easy. I did have a look at managing a repository here
Please please please use central.
Every time you host your own public repo a kitten is horribly mutilated by
the minions of the underworld.
More seriously if anyone adds your repo they impact their build performance
as they now have another repo to check artifacts against... It's not a big
From the point of view of Git, you're bloating your repo forcing everyone
to download all the JARs when they clone your repo.
From the point of view of GitHub, they don't want you to do that and might
very well break it in the future. At least use gh-pages, but that doesn't
solve the Git issue.
I've updated the stackoverflow question
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14013644/hosting-a-maven-repository-on-github
with these answers.
http://stackoverflow.com/a/22210816/552958
And spammed the best hits on google for similar questions.
Ideologic POV: Perso I'm very happy to download software from various
sources (I believe in linux you can have different sources)
So why we should have only ONE artifacts source?
Having a sort of routing per groupId is definitely something we need to develop.
NOTE: It's just an idea and ATM
On Wednesday, 5 March 2014, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Ideologic POV: Perso I'm very happy to download software from various
sources (I believe in linux you can have different sources)
So why we should have only ONE artifacts source?
I agree that a decentralised scheme is needed.
Le 5 mars 2014 23:47, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org a écrit :
Ideologic POV: Perso I'm very happy to download software from various
sources (I believe in linux you can have different sources)
So why we should have only ONE artifacts source?
+1
Having a sort of routing per groupId is
11 matches
Mail list logo
