Re: Version name to use for a release candidate?

2007-02-28 Thread Dan Adams
So right now when it's in snapshot the pom version should be 1.0-rc1-SNAPSHOT? And then when this is released it goes to 1.0-rc1 and the next version will be 1.0-rc2-SNAPSHOT? Correct? On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 16:34 -0600, Wayne Fay wrote: People generally use alpha or alpha-1, rc or rc1, etc to

RE: Version name to use for a release candidate?

2007-02-28 Thread Siegmann Daniel, NY
-Original Message- From: Dan Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 9:23 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: Version name to use for a release candidate? So right now when it's in snapshot the pom version should be 1.0-rc1-SNAPSHOT? And then when this is released

Version name to use for a release candidate?

2007-02-27 Thread Dan Adams
So I have a library that is in release candidate and I want to have it deployed to our releases repository and not be a snapshot. Because even though the library isn't finally released I still want people to be able to get the release candidates by version without using our snapshot repo. So the

Re: Version name to use for a release candidate?

2007-02-27 Thread Roland Asmann
You could use the maven release-plugin and tell it that your release-version is something like '1.0-rc1'. Then when it asks you for the new snapshot (development) version, tell it to be '1.0-SNAPSHOT' again... I believe that is the way to go... But Maven is pretty flexible with the versions...

Re: Version name to use for a release candidate?

2007-02-27 Thread Wayne Fay
People generally use alpha or alpha-1, rc or rc1, etc to designate release candidates. So in this case, I would probably use 1.0-alpha-1 or 1.0-rc1. Wayne On 2/27/07, Dan Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I have a library that is in release candidate and I want to have it deployed to our