and got us to CMMI level 4 while still working agile.
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Kick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 2:08 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: continuous integration server
@Liz
Just out of curiosity, why would you want to be running multiple
Matthew Tordoff wrote:
Has anyone looked at Bamboo?
We have used Bamboo for Mule for quite some time now. The setup seems to
be easy (haven't done it) and the day to day operations are supported by
the UI, too.
The only (big) boo that came up in the whole time we used it was that
Bamboo
Has anyone looked at Bamboo?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Huybrechts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 April 2008 13:21
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: continuous integration server
Hudson, without a doubt.
See https://hudson.dev.java.net/ or a live instance at
http
-
From: Tom Huybrechts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 April 2008 13:21
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: continuous integration server
Hudson, without a doubt.
See https://hudson.dev.java.net/ or a live instance at
http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 1:36 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: continuous integration server
Hudson, without a doubt.
See https://hudson.dev.java.net/ or a live instance at
http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Peter Horlock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Which continuous integration server would you
Message-
From: Jared Blitzstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 April 2008 16:50
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: continuous integration server
Just an FYI, bamboo 2.0 went live today. I've looked at both
Continuum, Bamboo, Hudson, and Team City. I've hit some weird
issues with Hudson
?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Huybrechts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 April 2008 13:21
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: continuous integration server
Hudson, without a doubt.
See https://hudson.dev.java.net/ or a live instance at
http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/
On Sun, Apr 13
looked at Bamboo?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Huybrechts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 April 2008 13:21
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: continuous integration server
Hudson, without a doubt.
See https://hudson.dev.java.net/ or a live instance at
http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/
On Sun
I use Vulcan. I like the fact that I can run multiple instances of it
in the same tomcat. It also does everything I need in a CI server.
http://code.google.com/p/vulcan/
Liz Sommers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe,
@Liz
Just out of curiosity, why would you want to be running multiple instances?
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Sommers, Elizabeth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use Vulcan. I like the fact that I can run multiple instances of it
in the same tomcat. It also does everything I need in a CI
Subject: Re: continuous integration server
The ease of installing Hudson was unbelievable, especially the test
drive. I want to elaborate on my statement a little bit, I looked at
Continuum and Hudson late last year and haven't used them since (though
I tried to give Hudson another spin 3 weeks ago
communication.
Regards,
Mayank
-Original Message-
From: Prystash,John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 12:17 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: RE: continuous integration server
We use QuickBuild, which is the professional version of Luntbuild, for
Maven
:44 AM, Matthew Tordoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone looked at Bamboo?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Huybrechts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 April 2008 13:21
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: continuous integration server
Hudson, without a doubt.
See
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Peter Horlock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Which continuous integration server would you recommend me?
Continuum? Or is there also a version by sonatype in the making?! :-)
We have been using CruiseControl (since July 2007), some of the other
CI tools
Hi,
Which continuous integration server would you recommend me?
Continuum? Or is there also a version by sonatype in the making?! :-)
Thanks in advance,
Peter
Hudson, without a doubt.
See https://hudson.dev.java.net/ or a live instance at
http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Peter Horlock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Which continuous integration server would you recommend me?
Continuum? Or is there also a version
could you tell me your reason why you prefer hudson?
Thanks,
Peter
, Apr 13, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Peter Horlock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Which continuous integration server would you recommend me?
Continuum? Or is there also a version by sonatype in the making?! :-)
Thanks in advance,
Peter
or external resources as such it is simple which allows it
to easily support multi-node setups.
On 13-Apr-08, at 4:36 AM, Peter Horlock wrote:
Hi,
Which continuous integration server would you recommend me?
Continuum? Or is there also a version by sonatype in the making?! :-)
Thanks
Kohsuke keeps it simple, yet very powerful. You can have Hudson
installed and your first build running within minutes.
If you need customization, it is also incredibly easy to extend via plugins.
Just try it, you'll never look back...
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Peter Horlock
[EMAIL
How about handling of maven2 project releases? Does it integrate nicely
with the release plugin?
And also, one point of concern is the security and roles management (who
can deploy/force builds/release per project?
I have been using Continuum for about a year without too many issues and
it deals
On 13-Apr-08, at 8:52 AM, Olivier Dehon wrote:
How about handling of maven2 project releases? Does it integrate
nicely
with the release plugin?
There's nothing magical about configuring Hudson to fire off any set
of plugins with any goals. We do on demand builds and releases with
Hudson
22 matches
Mail list logo
