javadoc versus shade

2010-02-03 Thread Benson Margulies
I find myself wishing that I could generate shaded javadoc: javadoc for renamed classes under their renamed names. Anyone been here? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: javadoc versus shade

2010-02-03 Thread Anders Hammar
I think that is impossible as the shading works on the class files, in which the javadoc comments have been removed (or?). You need the source to generate javadoc. And the source code isn't shaded. My 2 cents, /Anders On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 16:24, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote: I

combining javadoc versus shade

2009-08-04 Thread Benson Margulies
I have a multi-module top-level project. The first set of modules build ordinary JAR artifacts, and each has some javadoc with it. The next module just runs maven-shade-plugin to combine then into a shaded jar. Finally, there's a module to build a release package. I am not seeing how to

Re: combining javadoc versus shade

2009-08-04 Thread Daniel Kulp
I talked to Benson on IRC The solution (more like hack) that CXF uses to accomplish this is to use dependency plugin to unpack the source jars for everything being shaded and re-run the javadoc plugin on that unpacked source. It's a complete hack, but it at least works for what we