There was a conversion on this list in August that suggested jarjar,
minijar shade style of working.
Selenium needs to bundle Jetty in its server jar. Jetty is
notoriously hard to 'shade' given there are a gazillion fine grained
issues around reflection and other dependancies like the
Hi Paul,
Paul Hammant wrote:
There was a conversion on this list in August that suggested jarjar,
minijar shade style of working.
Selenium needs to bundle Jetty in its server jar. Jetty is
notoriously hard to 'shade' given there are a gazillion fine grained
issues around reflection and
There's one-jar now as a replacement for uber-jar.
It looks much faster - I'm running with that.
Cheers,
- Paul
On Dec 10, 2008, at 1:49 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Paul,
Paul Hammant wrote:
There was a conversion on this list in August that suggested jarjar,
minijar shade style of
Paul Hammant wrote at Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2008 00:29:
There's one-jar now as a replacement for uber-jar.
It looks much faster - I'm running with that.
In M1 we used javaapp instead - I suppose this did the same.
- Jörg
