Re: dependency resolution only before compile phase?

2005-09-24 Thread Orjan Austvold
The documentation for the @requiresDependencyResolution descriptor element states that it only works for compile, runtime and test scopes, not for the process-resources phase. http://maven.apache.org/maven2/developers/mojo-api-specification.html Maybe the docs are outdated then. Ørjan

Re: dependency resolution only before compile phase?

2005-09-24 Thread Brett Porter
That's correct: process-resources is a phase (a part of the build lifecycle), not a scope (a category of dependency). While the scopes bear names resembling phases, they are not the same thing. Did you have a problem using the tag? Regards, Brett On 9/24/05, Orjan Austvold [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [m2] netbeans-freeform feature request

2005-09-24 Thread Raphaël Piéroni
Hi Edwin, I am not sure of you're really looking for with that evolution. The way it work actually is to create a 'nbproject' folder as a child of the directory containing the 'current' project. 'current' can be the subproject in a multiproject environment. Correct me if i'm wrong. What you

Re: [m2b1] tests not seeing classes?

2005-09-24 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 11:07 -0500, Mike Perham wrote: I have a project which is compiling some Hibernate beans into target/classes and then running an integration test with Derby to ensure that the database creation and simple queries work, etc. Are these generated classes? I don't use

Problem with calling ant from site:site goal

2005-09-24 Thread Achim Hügen
Hi, I'm trying to call ant during the site:site goal: build plugin groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId artifactIdmaven-antrun-plugin/artifactId executions execution phasesite/phase

Re: [m2] project descriptor tags

2005-09-24 Thread Jesse McConnell
well, that would depend on how _old_ that trunk version is...I think brett put it in just a month ago or so.. I'll be back in town soon and can help you out on monday maybe.. paste in some examples of what you are trying to do jesse On 9/23/05, Yann Le Du [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Jesse,