Jim N schrieb am 16.05.2021 18:27 (GMT +07:00):
> im not sure whether the prior response fully bounced, so forgive the
> duplication:
>
> This is the maven users list not the shade issues tracker. expect
> helpful suggestions that don't share your viewpoints or goals.
Looks like it did, I did
MSHADE-252
https://github.com/apache/maven-shade-plugin/pull/88
Mentioned multiple times here, too, even very recently again. I am
feeling awkward, posting the link again, but I keep getting asked about
it, so I am replying. My apologies to everyone else who reads about this
PR again.
Tibor
im not sure whether the prior response fully bounced, so forgive the
duplication:
This is the maven users list not the shade issues tracker. expect
helpful suggestions that don't share your viewpoints or goals.
I'd suggest you find the shade plugin source code and resist the urge
to mix words
Where is the ticket in Jira?
Last time I meant when Romain improved the plugin a lot. Maybe before you
created the ticket.
T
On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 1:01 PM Alexander Kriegisch <
alexan...@kriegisch.name> wrote:
> Sorry Tibor, I am not sure which "last time" you are talking about. I
> think,
Sorry Tibor, I am not sure which "last time" you are talking about. I
think, last time I interacted with anyone concerning Maven Shade on Jira
was by commenting on an old, existing ticket, getting zero help and then
fixing the problem myself, trying return something to the community by
means of an
I have no idea what you are talking about and how your answer concerning
"non-relocating options" is relevant to my question about the opposite.
I also did not report any surprises during my deployments or runtime
behaviour of relocated classes. Thanks for your feedback anyway. Next
time, maybe
These Apache developers work with Jira based on objective materials
attached to Jira, like a reproducible project provided by you on Github or
a provided POM.
Then they will take care especially regarding the maven-shade-plugin they
want to improve this plugin, and there was a big effort given to
You might want to examine the "horrible" Non relocating options previously
outlined if you want a fast resolution to unsurprising deployments.
On Sun, May 16, 2021, 10:41 AM Alexander Kriegisch
wrote:
> When running Maven Shade with relocation, it works nicely. When
> comparing JARs before and
