Re: Please reopen MNG-4533 Add an always active profile activator

2015-11-24 Thread Arend v. Reinersdorff
think the answer is 'no', which means that the profile shouldn't always > be active. > File-based activation of profiles is also used only during build/site > time, so your workaround seems quite valid to me. > > regards, > Robert > > Op Mon, 23 Nov 2015 16:33:17 +0100 schreef Arend v.

Re: Please reopen MNG-4533 Add an always active profile activator

2015-11-23 Thread Arend v. Reinersdorff
at 1:44 PM, Arend v. Reinersdorff <ar...@arendvr.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarba...@gmx.de> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 11/14/15 10:06 PM, Arend v. Reinersdorff wrote: >> >>> Hi Karl Heinz, >>>

Re: Please reopen MNG-4533 Add an always active profile activator

2015-11-15 Thread Arend v. Reinersdorff
ing any other profiles. This is more flexible than using the > -P flag (which I avoid whenever possible). > > Regards, > Curtis > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Arend v. Reinersdorff <ar...@arendvr.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Karl Heinz, > > > > good poin

Re: Please reopen MNG-4533 Add an always active profile activator

2015-11-15 Thread Arend v. Reinersdorff
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarba...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On 11/14/15 10:06 PM, Arend v. Reinersdorff wrote: > >> Hi Karl Heinz, >> >> good point. I'll try to elaborate more: >> >> The idea is to have a p

Please reopen MNG-4533 Add an always active profile activator

2015-11-14 Thread Arend v. Reinersdorff
Hi, could issue MNG-4533 "Add an always active profile activator" please be reopened? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-4533 The issues was automatically closed in 2014. I find the current workarounds to create an always active profile (check for non existing property, check for always

Re: Please reopen MNG-4533 Add an always active profile activator

2015-11-14 Thread Arend v. Reinersdorff
${env.TEMP}/${project.groupId}/${project.artifactId} Best regards, Arend On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarba...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On 11/14/15 2:03 PM, Arend v. Reinersdorff wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> could issue

Re: Documentation (wrongly?) says Maven 3.3.1 runs with Java 1.6

2015-03-19 Thread Arend v. Reinersdorff
. On Mar 18, 2015, at 9:48 AM, Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net wrote: That is correct, the docs haven't been updated. Maven 3.3+ requires JDK 1.7. /Anders (mobile) Den 18 mar 2015 09:37 skrev Arend v. Reinersdorff ar...@arendvr.com: Hi, Maven 3.3.1 requires Java 1.7: - [MNG-5780

Documentation (wrongly?) says Maven 3.3.1 runs with Java 1.6

2015-03-18 Thread Arend v. Reinersdorff
Hi, Maven 3.3.1 requires Java 1.7: - [MNG-5780] - upgrade Java minimum version prerequisite from Java 6 to Java 7 - When I try to run Maven 3.3.1 with Java 1.6 I get the exception: Exception in thread main java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: org/apache/maven/cli/MavenCli : Unsupported

Re: Problem using project.name as build directory

2013-07-08 Thread Arend v. Reinersdorff
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Baptiste MATHUS bmat...@batmat.net wrote: That being said, I'm not sure project.name is guaranteed to fallback to project.artifactId value. So you might be relying on something unstable here. This is a good point. I remember reading somewhere that project.name

Re: Problem using project.name as build directory

2013-07-08 Thread Arend v. Reinersdorff
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Baptiste MATHUS bmat...@batmat.net wrote: As a side note, I would personnally prefer that there's no such fallback. I'm not sure I see much value here. In this cas it seems preferable to just use ${project.artifactId}. Agreed. I'll do this to fix my project.

Problem using project.name as build directory

2013-07-07 Thread Arend v. Reinersdorff
? Or is there a reason why I cannot rely on the default value here? Regards, Arend v. Reinersdorff