Re: [m2] Missing POMs for m1, legacy-style projects

2005-12-19 Thread Chris Berry
Inline. Cheers, -- Chris On 12/18/05, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/19/05, Chris Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know how to work around this?? Previously, we'd written a dummy into the local repository, but this meant that if you then went and corrected it

Re: [m2] Missing POMs for m1, legacy-style projects

2005-12-19 Thread John Casey
Just checking quickly, but is the --offline switch still problematic in 2.0.1? I applied a patch that fixed the missing pom problem (or so I thought), and this should have made it into the release...I'll need to look at it again if not. Thanks, John Chris Berry wrote: Inline. Cheers, --

[m2] Missing POMs for m1, legacy-style projects

2005-12-18 Thread Chris Berry
Greetings, AFAICT, m2 goes off and searches for POMs for each artifact it encounters. This is all well and good if the POMs exist, but when one is using a mix of m1 m2 repos, then there will be many artifacts that do not have associated POMs. m2 figures this out and moves on -- as it should --

Re: [m2] Missing POMs for m1, legacy-style projects

2005-12-18 Thread Brett Porter
On 12/19/05, Chris Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know how to work around this?? Previously, we'd written a dummy into the local repository, but this meant that if you then went and corrected it remotely it didn't get picked up. We need an alternative solution there. BTW: the