Yes, but as they are timestamped they are really easy to clean up.
It allows you to be more deterministic about what build you are
actually getting, and is consistent with the way m2 was implemented.
- Brett
On 8/25/05, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brett Porter wrote on Wednesday,
I put a RFE in JIRA for this: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPARTIFACT-59
2005/8/26, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, but as they are timestamped they are really easy to clean up.
It allows you to be more deterministic about what build you are
actually getting, and is consistent with
explicitly or on a scheduled basis).
Then the number of these files in the repository is much more manageable.
..David..
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 7:19 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: jar:install-snapshot
Brett Porter wrote on Wednesday, August 24, 2005 4:57 PM:
As of the 1.5 release of the Maven Artifact plugin, anything
with a SNAPSHOT name will automatically get timestamped.
... and with continuous integration builds we will have a new unique artifact
with every build automatically
As of the 1.5 release of the Maven Artifact plugin, anything with a
SNAPSHOT name will automatically get timestamped.
- Brett
On 8/25/05, Andreas Guther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi:
With the jar plug-in 1.7 I noticed that the creation of a versioned jar
file seems to be deprecated.
I
will be filled up with these timestamped snapshot
artifacts.
..David..
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 8:57 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: jar:install-snapshot - deprecated jar:snapshot
As of the 1.5 release
-snapshot - deprecated jar:snapshot
As of the 1.5 release of the Maven Artifact plugin, anything with a
SNAPSHOT name will automatically get timestamped.
- Brett
On 8/25/05, Andreas Guther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi:
With the jar plug-in 1.7 I noticed that the creation
