@ Valliere I am not available for a week.
On Tue, 20 Feb, 2024, 8:59 am Jonathan Valliere, wrote:
> @Kishore Mokkarala are you able to test this
> branch? https://github.com/apache/mina/compare/2.2.X...bugfix/DIRMINA-1173
>
> On Feb 18, 2024 at 2:05:57 PM, Jonathan Valliere
>
These changes in 2.2.x might have introduced deadlock in conjunction with
the state machine.
--
M.V.S.Kishore
91-9886412814
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 at 22:12, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
>
> On 17/02/2024 16:13, Kishore Mokkarala wrote:
> > My u
of dual-locking
> mechanism to ensure that multiple receiver threads to not operate in
> parallel. Either way, we have to guarantee a serial processing of incoming
> messages.
>
> The more I think about it the more concerned I am that we’re following a
> rabbit down a hole.
>
No, you should not have to create multiple instances. The
> > necessary
> > > stateful data is saved to the Connection.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Feb 1, 2024 at 5:22
SSLFilter in conjonction with the StateMachine filter.
>
> On 09/02/2024 05:33, Jonathan Valliere wrote:
> > No, you should not have to create multiple instances. The necessary
> > stateful data is saved to the Connection.
> >
> >
> > On Feb 1, 2024 at 5:22:3
Any response would be greatly appreciated.
--
M.V.S.Kishore
91-9886412814
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 22:17, Kishore Mokkarala
wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> Do we need to create a new instance of SSLFilter per tcp ip connection or
> can we reuse
Hi Emmanuel,
Do we need to create a new instance of SSLFilter per tcp ip connection or
can we reuse it ?
For example, do we need to repeat the same code for each tcp ip connection ?
*Approach 1:*
for(int i=0;i< 500;i++)
{
NioSocketConnector connector = new NioSocketConnector();
connector.getFilt
this in later releases ?
Regards,
--
M.V.S.Kishore
91-9886412814
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 12:48, Kishore Mokkarala
wrote:
> Also please look at the code.we have custom ssl filter for sending SNI
> Host name during SSL handshake and also how we are o
.
--
M.V.S.Kishore
91-9886412814
-- Forwarded message -
From: Kishore Mokkarala
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2024 at 14:26
Subject: Re: Deadlock in Apache mina version 2.2.1
To: Emmanuel Lécharny
Hi Emmanuel,
Thanks for your response.Here are the statemechine methods implemented.take
a look
, Kishore Mokkarala wrote:
> > Hi Emmanuel,
> > Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> > --
> > M.V.S.Kishore
> > 91-9886412814
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 at 13:34, Kishore Mokkarala > <mailto:k
rovider.getProbeDisplayName());
}
return sslEngine;
}
}
I will appreciate your help in advance.
--
M.V.S.Kishore
91-9886412814
On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 at 13:38, Kishore Mokkarala
wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel,
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Hi Emmanuel,
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
--
M.V.S.Kishore
91-9886412814
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 at 13:34, Kishore Mokkarala
wrote:
>
> Thanks Emmanuel,I appreciate your quick response. I have one quick
> question as you said "*fi
before
> trying to write anything. That means you need to avoid writing anything
> until the session_secured event has been handled.
>
> I wonder if the verifyAndSendStartMsgs should not be sent in
> session-secured event rather than in the session-opened...
>
>
gt; trying to write anything. That means you need to avoid writing anything
> until the session_secured event has been handled.
>
> I wonder if the verifyAndSendStartMsgs should not be sent in
> session-secured event rather than in the session-opened...
>
>
> On 27/12/2023
arny wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the problem is most certainly in the StateMachine part. I have to see
> > what it does.
> >
> > On 22/12/2023 17:13, Kishore Mokkarala wrote:
> >> *Hi Emmanuel,*
> >> *
> >> *
> >> *Deadlock is happenin
request);
}
....
..
}
--
M.V.S.Kishore
Lead Dev Engineer
NetScout S/w Pvt. Ltd.
91-9886412814
On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 at 20:10, Kishore Mokkarala
wrote:
>
>1.
> Is the below issue fi
-9886412814
-- Forwarded message -
From: Kishore Mokkarala
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 at 12:40
Subject: Deadlock in Apache mina version 2.2.1
To: Emmanuel Lécharny ,
Hi Emmanuel,
We are facing deadlock in production with mina 2.2.1 version,earlier it was
on 2.0.21, After upgrade only
ed, 26 Apr 2023 at 13:05, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
>
> On 26/04/2023 09:06, Kishore Mokkarala wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > I don't know how to create a JIRA, Please share me the link if any.
>
> First go there, selecting MINA project:
>
> https://selfserve.apache.
tion
> g10CaptureService.startRecordCapture(searchExpression,
> captureHandler, captureId); //connect to the probe again using same thread
> 1 instance.
>
> }
>
> --
> M.V.S.Kishore
>
> 91-9886412814
>
>
> On
lliere wrote:
> Please make a Jira. I also need an example to run which reproduces the
> error.
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 6:35 AM Kishore Mokkarala
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I have migrated from 2.0.21 to 2.023 for solving CVE, i have seen thread
> > b
Hi,
I have migrated from 2.0.21 to 2.023 for solving CVE, i have seen thread
blocking issue, So used latest mina verstion 2.2.1 but still threads were
blocked here is the sample code.Thread hungs at awaitUninterruptibly. Once
this issue comes in sub sequest launches nothing will work all threads
o document the
> 2.0 -> 2.2 mogration.
>
> Just let me know if it's OK with you !
>
> Thanks!
>
> On 17/04/2023 13:04, Kishore Mokkarala wrote:
> > Thank you all for the help.Here is my SSL implementation for making it
> work
> > with 2.2.1 for passi
ssion));
> > }
> > InetSocketAddress peer = (InetSocketAddress)
> > session.getAttribute(SslFilter.PEER_ADDRESS);
> > // Create the SSL engine here
> > if (peer == null) {
> > sslEngine = sslFilter.sslContext.createSSLEngin
tialize the engine in client mode if necessary
sslEngine.setUseClientMode(sslFilter.isUseClientMode());
Regards,
--
M.V.S.Kishore
91-9886412814
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 at 23:08, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/04/2023 18:00, Kishore Mok
lue
> about what the gpbMessageFilter does.
>
> On 10/04/2023 13:37, Kishore Mokkarala wrote:
> > Hi,
> > There was a security vulnerability in mina 2.0.21,So we were migrated
> > from apache mina 2.0.21 to 2.0.23,locally in the dev environment
> everything
> >
Hi,
There was a security vulnerability in mina 2.0.21,So we were migrated
from apache mina 2.0.21 to 2.0.23,locally in the dev environment everything
looks good, but in production we are facing connection timeout issue with
the mina version 2.0.23.
For connection set up it was taking 10-20 millisec
26 matches
Mail list logo
