Yeah like if you have a blocking database lookup then you would use the
executor filter to allow a bunch of blocking operations to occur without
blocking the entire IoProcessor. The executor filter is not really supposed
to make things faster.
On Oct 7, 2015 3:50 PM, "Марат Гайнуллин" wrote:
> Hi
Le 07/10/15 22:34, Марат Гайнуллин a écrit :
> Hi Emmanuel!
>
> According to last Jon message, there are already cores*2 IoProcessors
> involved in network processing. It changes everything. It seems, that
> executor filter is useless at all if a server doesn't perform any
> waiting/sleeping,
Hi Emmanuel!
According to last Jon message, there are already cores*2 IoProcessors
involved in network processing. It changes everything. It seems, that
executor filter is useless at all if a server doesn't perform any
waiting/sleeping, etc in its further logic (handler for example). It seem
Le 07/10/15 21:40, Jon V. a écrit :
> It would use more memory and since there is already 2x IoProcessors for cpu
> cores there would be no speedup. In fact it would lead to more memory
> fragmentation/cache misses and require one thread for every session.
Beside that, it would be impossible to kn
Hi, Jon!
Thak you for information about IoProcessors. If there are already
cores*2 IoProcessors, than things change much. It seems, that executor
filter is useless at all if a server doesn't perform any waiting/sleeping,
etc. It seems, that executor filter helps, when there are waiting/sleeping
It would use more memory and since there is already 2x IoProcessors for cpu
cores there would be no speedup. In fact it would lead to more memory
fragmentation/cache misses and require one thread for every session.
Basically, it would be a bad idea.
On Oct 7, 2015 3:36 PM, "Марат Гайнуллин" wrote
Dear sirs!
It is completely clear for me, that decoding of a buffer must be linear
and tcp messages fragments must be decoded in a serial manner. My question
is about different thing. Why not to decode SEPARATE sessions' data streams
in parallel?
7 окт. 2015 г. 10:18 PM пользователь "Jon V."
н
You also cannot process a linear buffer simultaneously. TCP is linear and
reading the messages must be linear. After you have a list of messages
then you may execute them in parallel but the line decoding of the buffer
must be single threaded. The decoder operates on an inbound buffer and
multi-
Le 07/10/15 20:44, Марат Гайнуллин a écrit :
> Dear sirs!
> I am happy to know, that DIRMINA-1013 has been fixed.
> I have a question. I think, that while decoding TCP messages in separate
> sessions, server SHOULD do it in parallel. Why your last comment on
> DIRMINA-934 was about not to put
Dear sirs!
I am happy to know, that DIRMINA-1013 has been fixed.
I have a question. I think, that while decoding TCP messages in separate
sessions, server SHOULD do it in parallel. Why your last comment on
DIRMINA-934 was about not to put executor filter before decoder in TCP? If
several threa
10 matches
Mail list logo
