http://stackoverflow.com/a/8015884/1589700
On 23 August 2012 14:34, Ertio Lew ertio...@gmail.com wrote:
How do I configure Myfaces to log through logback implementation which rest
of my application uses ? Currently I'm writing logs from all parts of my
application except the messages by
Did you ever say something you really regretted?
I really regret saying that I strongly preferred JUL over SL4J on the
logging vote two years back[1].
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-dev/200906.mbox/%3c8f985b960906060447g30bb216ew62102b39be2a1...@mail.gmail.com%3E
I am
Why doesn't Myfaces allows the flexibility to plug in your desired logging
SL4J implementation instead of restricting users to JUL/ Commons logging or
otherwise incurring the overheads of using bridgeHandlers etc ?!
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.comwrote:
Did
When we took the vote two years ago, I at least didn't really
understand the need.
Someone did bring up that point, but as a group we felt that
reinventing the wheel didn't make a lot of sense. SL4J was new, and
I for one didn't understand the advantages of using it.
If we were to vote again
Well, that and at the time, it seemed like JUL would let us do
everything SL4J claimed to do. But as I stated earlier, the
theoretical promises of JUL pluggability didn't live up to the real
use conditions.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com wrote:
When we
Yes, things change with time may be it didn't mattered too much that time
but today SL4J is the need as it is widely adopted now.
So +1 for SL4J !
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.comwrote:
Well, that and at the time, it seemed like JUL would let us do
6 matches
Mail list logo
