Re: NiFi Registry with nested PGs

2018-07-19 Thread Andrew Grande
I would also check the poll period. E.g. give it 40 secs or more to detect new versions in the registry, it's not real time. Andrew On Thu, Jul 19, 2018, 6:35 AM Mike Thomsen wrote: > Thanks, Kevin. If I get a chance I'll try it out again because it appeared > to be the case that after the

Re: NiFi Registry with nested PGs

2018-07-19 Thread Mike Thomsen
Thanks, Kevin. If I get a chance I'll try it out again because it appeared to be the case that after the definition changed to B:v2 that A did not show any sign it was changed. Could just be me misremembering it because it was late when we tried it. On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:50 PM Kevin Doran

Re: NiFi Registry with nested PGs

2018-07-18 Thread Kevin Doran
Hi Mike, Yes, this is expected behavior. Let's say I have a PG A that has a nested versioned PG B, both are at version 1. Because PG B is versioned, the full definition of PG A does not extend down into PG B, it stops at a reference to "PG B:v1". Because PG B is versioned independently, a

NiFi Registry with nested PGs

2018-07-18 Thread Mike Thomsen
We have 0.2 hooked up to a NiFi instance that has nested PGs. All PGs are versioned. When one of the inner ones has local changes, the out of sync icon doesn't appear on the parent PGs. Is that expected behavior? No one really minds it, but I didn't have an answer as to whether we stumbled onto a