Aw: Re: Re: Re: Re: new Nifi Processors

Joe, thanks. I added the LICENCE and NOTICE file to the nar and also licence info in all classes. Rgds, Uwe > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 02. März 2017 um 22:07 Uhr > Von: "Joe Witt" <joe.w...@gmail.com> > An: users@nifi.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Re: Re: Re:

Re: new Nifi Processors

det: Donnerstag, 02. März 2017 um 22:07 Uhr > Von: "Joe Witt" <joe.w...@gmail.com> > An: users@nifi.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Re: Re: Re: new Nifi Processors > > Uwe > > To progress toward a pull request for inclusion in the nifi community > we will need a LICENSE/NOTI

Re: Re: Re: Re: new Nifi Processors

he Apache side? > > Rgds, > > Uwe > > >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 02. März 2017 um 15:53 Uhr >> Von: "Matt Burgess" <mattyb...@apache.org> >> An: users@nifi.apache.org >> Betreff: Re: Re: Re: new Nifi Processors >> >> Uwe, >> >

Aw: Re: Re: Re: new Nifi Processors

"Matt Burgess" <mattyb...@apache.org> > An: users@nifi.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Re: Re: new Nifi Processors > > Uwe, > > If your NAR can be licensed under the Apache Software License 2.0, > then you shouldn't run into any issues with other folks want to > pack

Re: Aw: Re: new Nifi Processors

re of Apache 2.0 versus GPL3. That would help me understand the issue better. Greetings and thanks for feedback. Uwe *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 01. März 2017 um 03:33 Uhr *Von:* "Angry Duck Studio" <angryduckstu...@gmail.com> *An:* users@nifi.apache.org *Betreff:* Re: new Nifi Processors

Re: new Nifi Processors

.de> Reply-To: "users@nifi.apache.org" <users@nifi.apache.org> Date: Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 4:10 AM To: "users@nifi.apache.org" <users@nifi.apache.org> Subject: Aw: Re: Re: new Nifi Processors Thanks Andrew, Matt also pointed me to the same direction.

Re: Re: Re: new Nifi Processors

have a similar problem there? Do you know? > > I will spend some time on the topic on the weekend... > > Rgds, > > Uwe > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 02. März 2017 um 05:06 Uhr > Von: "Andrew Grande" <apere...@gmail.com> > An: users@nifi.apache.org >

Aw: Re: Re: new Nifi Processors

will spend some time on the topic on the weekend...   Rgds,   Uwe   Gesendet: Donnerstag, 02. März 2017 um 05:06 Uhr Von: "Andrew Grande" <apere...@gmail.com> An: users@nifi.apache.org Betreff: Re: Re: new Nifi Processors Basically the GPL license puts restrictions on how on

Re: Re: new Nifi Processors

t whatever is necessary, so that the license is > not a hurdle for using the processors. Nifi is a really great product and I > still remember my first impression when I saw it. > > > > Greetings, > > > > Uwe > > > >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 01. März 2017

Re: Re: new Nifi Processors

t; Greetings, > > Uwe > >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 01. März 2017 um 03:56 Uhr >> Von: "Matt Burgess" <mattyb...@apache.org> >> An: users@nifi.apache.org >> Betreff: Re: new Nifi Processors >> >> Uwe G has made his processors available (thank you

Aw: Re: new Nifi Processors

t; Von: "Matt Burgess" <mattyb...@apache.org> > An: users@nifi.apache.org > Betreff: Re: new Nifi Processors > > Uwe G has made his processors available (thank you!) via his own repo > vs the official Apache NiFi repo; this may be directly related to your > poin

Aw: Re: new Nifi Processors

...@gmail.com> An: users@nifi.apache.org Betreff: Re: new Nifi Processors Hi, Uwe,   These look useful. However, typically custom processors are either Apache 2.0 or MIT licensed. These don't seem to specify a license, but your business rule engine (jare) seems to be GPL 3.0 licensed. I'm no

Aw: Re: new Nifi Processors

Thank you Andre.   Gesendet: Mittwoch, 01. März 2017 um 04:05 Uhr Von: Andre <andre-li...@fucs.org> An: users@nifi.apache.org Betreff: Re: new Nifi Processors All,   It may also be worth to note that JFrazee maintains a list of NiFi related links here:   https://github.com/jfrazee/a

Re: new Nifi Processors

All, It may also be worth to note that JFrazee maintains a list of NiFi related links here: https://github.com/jfrazee/awesome-nifi On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Matt Burgess wrote: > Uwe G has made his processors available (thank you!) via his own repo > vs the

Re: new Nifi Processors

Uwe G has made his processors available (thank you!) via his own repo vs the official Apache NiFi repo; this may be directly related to your point about licensing. Having said that, he is of course at liberty to license those separate processors as he sees fit (assuming it is also in accordance

Re: new Nifi Processors

Hi, Uwe, These look useful. However, typically custom processors are either Apache 2.0 or MIT licensed. These don't seem to specify a license, but your business rule engine (jare) seems to be GPL 3.0 licensed. I'm not sure that fits with most uses of NiFi. Can you please clarify? Thanks -Matt