I've converted over our flows based on your recommendation, will monitor
and report back if I see any issues
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 8:43 AM Mark Payne wrote:
> Dan, et al,
>
> Great news! I was able to replicate this issue finally, by creating a
> Load-Balanced connection
> between two
Mark, you are a troubleshooting master! thanks for chasing this down as
this new feature is really awesome and we are about to start using it. Good
to know there is a semi-safe workaround.
Boris
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 10:43 AM Mark Payne wrote:
> Dan, et al,
>
> Great news! I was able to
Thank you Mark! This is great news and promising... I'll look into
refactoring our flows per your suggestion...
Regards
Dano
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018, 8:43 AM Mark Payne Dan, et al,
>
> Great news! I was able to replicate this issue finally, by creating a
> Load-Balanced connection
> between two
Dan, et al,
Great news! I was able to replicate this issue finally, by creating a
Load-Balanced connection
between two Process Groups/Ports instead of between two processors. The fact
that it's between
two Ports does not, in and of itself, matter. But there is a race condition,
and Ports do no
