Hi,
we managed to set up some OSGi features making OpenEJB to work with Apache
Karaf.
Could you have a look to our existing features and let us know if that is
enough or not?
May be, we'll have to change some import to make EclipseLink imports
optional but there.
Feel free to open a JIRA with a p
On Jan 30, 2012, at 2:13 AM, john70 wrote:
> Hi Romain,
>
> Thank you very much for response!
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau wrote
>>
>> Why do you prefer jetty? You can run tomee in a test, you can use
>> arquillian, you can run it from your pom too. Do you prefer jetty because
>> of jetty or beca
Hi,
I'm trying to integrate OpenEJB lite container with EclipseLink (in
Equinox). I looked at openejb-lite-4.0.0-beta-1 bundle but it
contains OpenJPA packages I don't really need.
On the other hand, OpenEJB standalone server contains separate bundles
but there are too many in there. Could you pl
Hi Romain,
Thank you very much for response!
Romain Manni-Bucau wrote
>
> Why do you prefer jetty? You can run tomee in a test, you can use
> arquillian, you can run it from your pom too. Do you prefer jetty because
> of jetty or because of something missing to tomcat/tomee?
>
First because o
Hi John,
some work was started then remove from active trunk:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/trunk/sandbox/inactive/openejb-jetty/
The issue is mainly TomEE needed a lot of work and i'm not sure we could do
it again.
Why do you prefer jetty? You can run tomee in a test, you can use
arq
Hi all,
are there any plans to add support for Jetty?
I mean similar distribution as TomEE but with Jetty as Servlet-container.
I'm personally would prefer to use Jetty instead of Tomcat.
Thanks in advance!
Best regards,
John.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.co
