i dont think (or it is not known today)
i personnally would like to keep it a gui + transport webapp.
wonder if we shouldnt move transport part BTW. We could do it
programmatically and totally skip the webapp (something to think about
after next release).
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibu
David:
Thank you very much for your answer. Is the ability to remove webapps/tomee
directory a durable one?
Won't there be future "mandatory" features requiring this web app?
Alex
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 7:29 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Sep 16, 2012, at 8:16 AM, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>
> >
On Sep 16, 2012, at 8:16 AM, Alex The Rocker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can the webapps/tomee directory be deleted for deploying a web app to
> production TomEE/TomEE+ server and exposed to Internet?
> Indeed, when delivering our app with Tomcat, we delete all default web apps
> as part of a list of To
Hello,
Can the webapps/tomee directory be deleted for deploying a web app to
production TomEE/TomEE+ server and exposed to Internet?
Indeed, when delivering our app with Tomcat, we delete all default web apps
as part of a list of Tomcat hardening task list.
Is there any TomEE/TomE++ vital content
David:
Thank you very much for your clear answer, it's alright : I understand that
you're doing best effort to get 1.1.0 done for JavaOne, I guess that even
if it's not ready at this time it could be available early october. I'm
going to take the risk and bet on it for our project (time to have g
Still no luck,
I have tried to change the pojo deployment class too with the RESTService
http://www.openejb.org/openejb-jar/1.1";>
cxf.jax-rs.providers = jsonProvider, jaxbProvider
And I have changed the resources.xml
I still get the 415 error
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Ro
i'd say something like
create method doesn't exist so it can't be called
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau*
*Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com*
2012/9/16 Luca Merolla
> I have openejb-jar.xml like this:
>
> http://www.openejb.org/openejb-jar/1.1";>
>
>
> cxf.jax-rs.
I have openejb-jar.xml like this:
http://www.openejb.org/openejb-jar/1.1";>
cxf.jax-rs.providers = jsonProvider, jaxbProvider
and resources.xml
I have tried both in WEB-INF or in META-INF. Still nothing.
Is it correct the pojo-deployment class-name with the Applica
just to keep a track on this thread putting here the issue you opened:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-111
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau*
*Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com*
2012/9/15 Yaocl
> Sorry this problem is related to codi not tomee.
> After upgrade the b
the format in openejb-jar.xml properties for such thing is:
= , ...
so you need to define your providers as resources (the example i pointed
out previously does it with different needs (that's nto providers) but same
logic)
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau*
*Blog: http://rmannibucau.
I don't have a resources.xml file. What should I define there relate to the
REST application? The Application class or
the org.codehaus.jackson.jaxrs.JacksonJsonProvider?
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Almost but not totally.
>
> 1) i think you should put it in web-i
11 matches
Mail list logo
