y need to
figure
out where it might be.
-David
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Non-daemon-threads-launched-by-Timer-service-and-not-properly-stopped-tp21231460p21542704.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
h
can definitely put an explicit call there to clean up any timers.
>>> It might not fix this particular issue as we don't currently
>>> aggressively "clean" the VM when it's shutting down -- better said we
>>> rely tightly controlled references and the ga
o
affect undeployment as well as shutdown. We definitely need to
figure
out where it might be.
-David
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Non-daemon-threads-launched-by-Timer-service-and-not-properly-stopped-tp21231460p21542704.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
en it's shutting down -- better said we
> rely tightly controlled references and the garbage collector which
> does a great job. If there is a timer-related leak it's going to
> affect undeployment as well as shutdown. We definitely need to figure
> out where it might be.
>
> -David
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Non-daemon-threads-launched-by-Timer-service-and-not-properly-stopped-tp21231460p21542704.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Jan 5, 2009, at 8:28 AM, uglything wrote:
Hie.
I tried the finalize approach, but unfortunately it doesn't seem to
work...
Some hard reference must be kept somewhere but I can't find where.
I've not looked thoroughly thought...
I took a quick look as well and couldn't find anything st
--
>>>
>>> As expected, the server shuts down smoothly now.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if this is a bug or not, i might have misconfigured
>>&
ServiceImpl that might do the trick. Easy change to make but
> harder to test. Seems like you're already setup, if you wanted to
> give that a try and give a thumbs up or thumbs down, that would be
> fantastic -- would be a big help and we love new contributors. If
> not, I can add that in a push up some binaries that you can test out.
>
> Added a bug report for it:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-983
>
> Either way, thanks for finding this!
>
> -David
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Non-daemon-threads-launched-by-Timer-service-and-not-properly-stopped-tp21231460p21275236.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Dec 31, 2008, at 5:30 AM, uglything wrote:
PS : I wish you all a nice new year eve !!!
Happy new year to you!!
PPS : I'm trying to make my managers switch to OpenEJB 3.1, I'm
particularly
interrested in the Singleton mechanism. Many thanks to the OpenEJB
crew for
it's amazing work at s
to OpenEJB 3.1, I'm particularly
interrested in the Singleton mechanism. Many thanks to the OpenEJB crew for
it's amazing work at sticking to both the EJB specs and user's expectations
!!!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Non-daemon-threads-launched-by-Tim
