I agree, this is a great discussion!
I know this is an old topic, but I was doing some browsing, came across this
topic, and thought I might take a look, since I have had the same goal...
'Tomee Plus instead of Glassfish'. :)
It 'sounds' good, and for good 'business' to allow developers to 'drop
this
topic, and thought I might take a look, since I have had the same goal...
'Tomee Plus instead of Glassfish'. :)
It 'sounds' good, and for good 'business' to allow developers to 'drop' an
app (or deploy an app) to any container, but honestly, I don't mind the
work
involved to go from
a look, since I have had the same goal...
'Tomee Plus instead of Glassfish'. :)
It 'sounds' good, and for good 'business' to allow developers to 'drop'
an
app (or deploy an app) to any container, but honestly, I don't mind the
work
involved to go from one container (e.g. Glassfish
...
'Tomee Plus instead of Glassfish'. :)
It 'sounds' good, and for good 'business' to allow developers to 'drop'
an
app (or deploy an app) to any container, but honestly, I don't mind the
work
involved to go from one container (e.g. Glassfish) to another container
(TomEE
David,
Not sure how to understand that post content.
IMO, a @Local annotation (without any interface specified) on the bean
class is not allowed by the spec.
JLouis
2012/6/4 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Jun 3, 2012, at 9:18 AM, Marco de Booij wrote:
@Local
I distinctly remember having seen the combo @Local @Stateless
in a Glassfish tutorial a few years ago, because I copied from
that tutorial and used the code for a while (in Glassfish 2.1)
until I ran into some unrelated problem that made me rewrite
all my annotations.
--
Björn Danielsson
Cuspy
comments and
flames welcome ;-)
Best Regards,
Neale
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
To: users@openejb.apache.org
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 7:07 PM
Subject: Re: Tomee Plus instead of Glassfish
David,
Not sure how to understand that post content
Subject: Re: Tomee Plus instead of Glassfish
David,
Not sure how to understand that post content.
IMO, a @Local annotation (without any interface specified) on the bean
class is not allowed by the spec.
JLouis
2012/6/4 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Jun 3, 2012, at 9:18 AM
, 2012 3:13 AM
Subject: Re: Tomee Plus instead of Glassfish
hmm,
personnally (you probably know) i have no issue doing something not in the
spec but here i don't find it logical, i even don't understand it at all.
If there is no interface that's obviously local (even localbean is weird
by
the way
and thanks Romain for
getting the discussion going ;-)
Best Regards,
Neale
- Original Message -
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@openejb.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 3:13 AM
Subject: Re: Tomee Plus instead of Glassfish
hmm,
personnally (you probably
: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 3:13 AM
Subject: Re: Tomee Plus instead of Glassfish
hmm,
personnally (you probably know) i have no issue doing something not
in the
spec but here i don't find it logical, i even don't understand it at
all.
If there is no interface that's obviously local (even localbean
@openejb.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 3:13 AM
Subject: Re: Tomee Plus instead of Glassfish
hmm,
personnally (you probably know) i have no issue doing something not
in the
spec but here i don't find it logical, i even don't understand it at
all.
If there is no interface that's obviously
going ;-)
Best Regards,
Neale
- Original Message - From: Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@openejb.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 3:13 AM
Subject: Re: Tomee Plus instead of Glassfish
hmm,
personnally (you probably know) i have no issue doing something
Great discussion!
Note, I'm also having this exact same discussion with the JBoss folks who are
also facing the same issue.
We'll be working this out with GlassFish and likely making some clarifications
or changes in EJB 3.2.
On Jun 4, 2012, at 9:58 AM, Neale Rudd wrote:
If Glassfish is
On Jun 4, 2012, at 2:07 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Not sure how to understand that post content.
IMO, a @Local annotation (without any interface specified) on the bean
class is not allowed by the spec.
Exactly right. On deploy we flagged it and failed the deployment with a clear
error
Hi,
Note that the TCK license agreement explicitly mentions such flags.
They are allowed but must be on by default. The default settings must
be compliant. -David
Curious how JBoss AS was certified and used to be non-compliant on the
default configuration. At least this was the case with
On Jun 4, 2012, at 1:24 PM, Fernando Lozano wrote:
Hi,
Note that the TCK license agreement explicitly mentions such flags. They are
allowed but must be on by default. The default settings must be compliant.
-David
Curious how JBoss AS was certified and used to be non-compliant on the
practice for the sake of making people's lives
easier when migrating non-compliant apps from glassfish to tomee.
Maybe creating a Migrating Your App from Glassfish to Tomee webpage would
be helpful.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Tomee-Plus-instead-of-Glassfish
programming practice for the sake of making people's lives
easier when migrating non-compliant apps from glassfish to tomee.
Maybe creating a Migrating Your App from Glassfish to Tomee webpage would
be helpful.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Tomee-Plus-instead
Hello,
Nearly 2 years ago I tried OpenEJB. I wanted to use it with Tomcat. It
was not such a big success for me :-( Lack of knowledge from my side. I
went to Glassfish and there I managed to get an application running. I
used EJB3.1 so I could pack the whole application in a single WAR and
Hi,
Can you share some code?
Tomee supports ejb 3.1
Romain
Le 3 juin 2012 16:16, Marco de Booij mdeb...@scarlet.be a écrit :
Hello,
Nearly 2 years ago I tried OpenEJB. I wanted to use it with Tomcat. It was
not such a big success for me :-( Lack of knowledge from my side. I went to
Hello,
My EJB is like:
@Local
@Stateless(mappedName = CodeDao)
public class I18nCodeDao extends DaoI18nCodeDto {
static Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(I18nCodeDao.class);
@PersistenceContext(unitName=doos,
type=PersistenceContextType.TRANSACTION)
private EntityManager em;
2notes:
1) @local needs an interface (remove it)
2) mappedname is container dependent (remove it)
Le 3 juin 2012 18:23, Marco de Booij mdeb...@scarlet.be a écrit :
Hello,
My EJB is like:
@Local
@Stateless(mappedName = CodeDao)
public class I18nCodeDao extends DaoI18nCodeDto {
static
Thanks. The errors disappeared.
Op 03-06-12 18:49, Romain Manni-Bucau schreef:
2notes:
1) @local needs an interface (remove it)
2) mappedname is container dependent (remove it)
Le 3 juin 2012 18:23, Marco de Booijmdeb...@scarlet.be a écrit :
Hello,
My EJB is like:
@Local
On Jun 3, 2012, at 9:18 AM, Marco de Booij wrote:
@Local
@Stateless(name=I18nCodeManager)
public class I18nCodeManager {
@EJB
private I18nCodeDao i18nCodeDao;
Strangely enough we're seeing a lot of portability issues on GlassFish's
handling of @Local.
Some JBoss friends just
25 matches
Mail list logo
