On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Pinaki Poddar wrote:
> While I will keep aside the later design principle for now, the former
> principle applies for the current topic. This forward-looking tendency can
> be observed when many "new" JPA features can be mapped onto "existing"
> OpenJPA features
Hi,
Matthew asks a pertinent question:
> When will OpenJPA support JPA 2.1?
Kevin's response is factual as well
> Pinaki has went so far to create a sandbox and start experimenting with an
> implementation. Again, he's a one-man show and can't do it all. Well, he
> probably could, but it wo
I have a unidirectional one to many relationship defined but I am getting a
foreign key constraint violation when attempting to run a delete on the
entity. It appears the delete statements are not being issued in the
correct order. The entity record is being deleted before the records with
the fo
I'm not concerned about the fact that most OpenJPA committers are IBM
employees, but committership *is* de facto closed by the usual Apache
meritocracy principles.
If you don't get enough volunteers among Apache members for upgrading
OpenJPA to JPA 2.1, you might start thinking about making it eas
