Sorry, never did thank you for your reply!
I ended up choosing PostgreSQL and so far it works fine.
/Bengt
2016-10-07 11:37 GMT+02:00 Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org>:
> On 07/10/2016 10:47, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
>
>> On 07/10/2016 09:47, Bengt Rodehav
I'm in the process of choosing database system for my next project. It's a
web application running on Apache Karaf. Not very high throughput
requirements. Easy operation (backup/restore and good GUI) is important to
me.
But, I also need to know that it works well with OpenJPA. In the OpenJPA
The other point could be a start order behavior, but I also saw that
> pax-jdbc karaf feature is now using karaf requirement and capabilities so
> it could be also fixed ;).
>
> So let's wait and see K4.0.6 version!
>
> Regards,
>
> 2016-07-11 10:23 GMT+02:00 Bengt Rodehav <
3:34 em skrev "Bengt Rodehav" <be...@rodehav.com>:
> We have just updated our SQL Server from 2008 to 2014. We are using
> OpenJPA 2.1.1. We used to use version 3.0 of Microsoft's JDBC driver.
> However, it didn't work with 2014. Somewhere I read that I need at least
>
Sounds like an interesting idea to me. It would allow me to import any
packages I need in order to properly configure the entity manager factory.
My original idea was that OpenJPA should use the class loader for the
bundle that contained the persistence.xml. That way I could make sure that
bundle
Hello Pinaki,
Do you know if there is any progress on the class loading refactoring you
initiated a while back?
/Bengt
2012/6/27 Pinaki Poddar ppod...@apache.org
Hi,
Wow.
Good to know that you have found this audit facility useful.
I have added a test that shows an example of
Hello there Jim,
I was part of initiating that support for OpenJPA (Pinaki implemented it)
but I haven't used it myself yet. The reason is that I couldn't get the
class loading to work when running within OSGi. There is still an
outstanding issue regarding this:
Has no one else encountered this? Does someone has any ideas of how to get
rid of this?
/Bengt
2012/3/29 Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com
I'm using OpenJPA 2.1.1 with Microsoft SQLServer 2005.
In one of my entities I have a field that can potentially be quite large
(it represents an incoming
: bengt.rode...@gmail.com [mailto:bengt.rode...@gmail.com]
Im Auftrag von Bengt Rodehav
Gesendet: Montag, 2. April 2012 08:59
An: users@openjpa.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Problems with SQLServer VARCHAR(MAX)
Has no one else encountered this? Does someone has any ideas
of how to get rid
I'm using OpenJPA 2.1.1 with Microsoft SQLServer 2005.
In one of my entities I have a field that can potentially be quite large
(it represents an incoming XML message). I therefore store it in a column
defined as VARCHAR(MAX). This possibility was introduced in SQLServer
2005 and allows storing
with OpenJPA (and perhaps Karaf). I will also
cross post this on the Aries list.
I appreciate any help,
/Bengt
2011/12/21 Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com
I'm using OpenJPA 2.1.1 on Karaf 2.2.4. I also use the aries transaction
support (0.3). I use SQL Server 2005.
I'm getting very slow query
of
INFO which explains the big difference in performance.
/Bengt
2011/12/22 Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com
Here is an update reflecting my latest findings.
It seems I only get bad performance when running inside Karaf. E g
retrieving all rows in the table (5800) takes about 130 ms when I run
I'm using OpenJPA 2.1.1 on Karaf 2.2.4. I also use the aries transaction
support (0.3). I use SQL Server 2005.
I'm getting very slow query responses. Retrieving 330 rows with 5 columns
takes almost 4 seconds (about 100 bytes per row). Running the SQL Server
profiler I can see that the actual
Thanks for your advice Pinaki - will try it.
I guess though that these timeouts will not affect aries-jta's transaction
timeout but they will still cause the transaction to fail - right?
Yes, I read on this list that the classloading refactoring wasn't
successful. Looking forward to a new
I use Aries JPA and Aries Transaction with OpenJpa. I have problems with
some long transactions that time out (I think anyway). I cannot see where I
can configure the transaction timeout for Aries Transaction. The only
interaction I have with Aries Transaction is my blueprint definition where
I
Yes that is correct.
I think the functionality is very useful and I did get it to work when
running outside of OSGi. However, in OSGi there seems to be a class loading
issue that prevents OpenJPA from finding my auditor class.
For me, OSGi is a requirement but for those who do not require OSGi,
I created the following JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2052
/Bengt
2011/9/13 Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com
Hello,
Just wanted to check if you've had any chance to look at this Pinak.
/Bengt
2011/9/8 Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com
Hello again,
I'm
Hello,
Just wanted to check if you've had any chance to look at this Pinak.
/Bengt
2011/9/8 Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com
Hello again,
I'm not familiar with the class resolver plugin but I did the following:
- I created a resolver (code is at the end of the mail)
- I configured my
Hello again,
I'm not familiar with the class resolver plugin but I did the following:
- I created a resolver (code is at the end of the mail)
- I configured my persistence.xml to use that resolver (persistence.xml at
the end of the mail)
The above does not throw any exceptions on startup. On
confirm this? Shalll I create a JIRA?
/Bengt
2011/9/4 Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com
Hello everyone,
After a long discussion about audit logging on this mailing list, Pinaki
developed an audit logging facility that he describes on:
http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-Audit-Facility
Hello everyone,
After a long discussion about audit logging on this mailing list, Pinaki
developed an audit logging facility that he describes on:
http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-Audit-Facility-tc6722915.html
It provides very interesting functionality and I've tried it in simple
Pinaki,
I've been on vacation again for a week which is why I'm late replying.
I think there must be a way to get hold of the original object since
that's the object I need to audit log. An unmanaged POJO is fine for my
purposes since I just want to serialize it. I will then persist it to a
Interesting - will definitely take a look.
/Bengt
Den 29 jul 2011 19:24 skrev pif frank.pien...@googlemail.com:
perhaps http://jpasecurity.sourceforge.net/
can help you to control access as JPA xxtension, but it's more for
security
auditing than just logging
regards
Frank
--
View this
Hello Pinaki,
Thanks for looking into this. What you are suggesting seems useful and it
would be really nice if this functionality is supported in the future.
However, I can't see how it directly solves my problem. What I'm trying to
do in my audit log is to save a serialized form of my entity -
Yes, you're right Pinaki.
I've attached a test case to the JIRA now. I'm very interested in your
verdict...
/Bengt
2011/7/26 Pinaki Poddar ppod...@apache.org
Hi Bengt,
This thread has grown too lengthy for me to find where was the @PreUpdate
code.
For better convergence, please create a
. The reason is that mandatory
values are missing. Values that exist in the persisted entity (variable
bu) but are not updated. If I remove the audit logging from my @PreUpdate
method, the JUnit test case succeeds.
Any clues?
/Bengt
2011/7/21 Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com
I'm currently
I'm currently in Turkey on vacation but will try when I get back to Sweden.
/Bengt
Den 19 jul 2011 17:48 skrev Pinaki Poddar ppod...@apache.org:
Hi Bengt,
It is not obvious to me how DetachState related options will impact
in-transaction entities. But I am interested to know the result of your
committed (got
my time eaten up by a few other Apache projects lately).
LieGrue,
stru
--- On Sat, 7/16/11, Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com wrote:
From: Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com
Subject: Re: Audit log with OpenJPA
To: users@openjpa.apache.org
Date: Saturday, July 16, 2011, 8:40 PM
Did you have a suggestion regarding this Pinaki - or does OpenJPA only keep
track of changed values - not the whole original object?
/Bengt
2011/7/15 Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com
I don't understand Pinaki.
The this pointer is the current version of the object (the one that is
about
I don't understand Pinaki.
The this pointer is the current version of the object (the one that is
about to be persisted) right? I want the previous version of the object. I
have used your code from the blog (and added some of course) like this:
*
PersistenceCapable currentState =
Hi again Jim,
2011/7/14 Jim Talbut jtal...@spudsoft.co.uk
On 13/07/2011 21:14, Pinaki Poddar wrote:
Yes. Any audit facility needs to have a snapshot of the entity when it
entered a persistence context, so at @PreUpdate or at any other time
points,
it can figure out what has essentially
Pinaki,
Thanks for your very insightful post. It feels like this is the way to go
then. I'll stick with this approach for now and try to follow the
development of JPA and OpenJPA.
Thanks for your help,
/Bengt
2011/7/14 Pinaki Poddar ppod...@apache.org
Jim,
I was making generic statements
(the previous
version of the object that is)?
/Bengt
2011/7/14 Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com
Pinaki,
Thanks for your very insightful post. It feels like this is the way to go
then. I'll stick with this approach for now and try to follow the
development of JPA and OpenJPA.
Thanks for your
Pinaki,
I agree with all your statements. I would like to keep the audit logging
out of my business domain (separating of concerns). I just hadn't found a
good way of doing this with JPA yet. Jim's approach gave me a way of being
able to create new entities in @PreUpdate however with the
Just tried your suggestion Pinaki - it works fine and I can keep the audit
logging completely separate from my domain model. I even get rid of the join
table.
Now if this were clearly supported by OpenJPA (and by JPA in the future) I
think we have a clear winner...
/Bengt
2011/7/14 Bengt
of doing
things. My guess is yes since you don't actually use the entity manager
yourself.
Very interesting approach.
Thanks,
/Bengt
2011/7/12 Jim Talbut jtal...@spudsoft.co.uk
On 07/07/2011 12:05, Bengt Rodehav wrote:
I'm using OpenJPA for persistence and would like to audit log any
2011/7/12 Jim Talbut jtal...@spudsoft.co.uk
On 12/07/2011 08:49, Bengt Rodehav wrote:
Your other design decision is also interesting. By having a relationship
to
the audit log entries JPA will persist the audit log entry for you - very
convenient indeed. A little similar to the way Pinaki
) {
AuditLog al = new AuditLog();
al.setLogEntry(serialization of object);
auditLog.add(al);
}
}
OpenJPA doesn't seem to like this. What did you do differently?
/Bengt
2011/7/12 Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com
OK - I didn't know that.
I agree that it would be nice if the OpenJPA
Indeed very interesting stuff (JEST). I'm not sure whether I want straight
lines from the client to the persistence layer though. Normally you would
want a layer in between for adding business logic, security etc. What is
interesting is to send general queries from the client to the server and
Pinaki,
Can you point me to where I can find documentation about acessing the entity
manager from the life cycle callbacks? Will it be supported in OpenJPA in
the future? Can I rely on it?
/Bengt
2011/7/8 Pinaki Poddar ppod...@apache.org
you actually store it in the object itself.
That's
I'm using OpenJPA for persistence and would like to audit log any changes
made to my entities. I serialize the objects to JSON (with Gson) and store
them in a separate table in the database. Since the audit log needs to have
the correct id's, the audit logging must take place after the entity has
the complexity significantly (also regarding testing).
Thanks,
/Bengt
2011/7/7 Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi
7.7.2011 14:05, Bengt Rodehav kirjoitti:
I'm using OpenJPA for persistence and would like to audit log any changes
made to my entities. I serialize the objects to JSON (with Gson
2011, Bengt Rodehav wrote:
I'm using OpenJPA for persistence and would like to audit log any changes
made to my entities. I serialize the objects to JSON (with Gson) and
store
them in a separate table in the database. Since the audit log needs to
have
the correct id's, the audit logging
-Andy
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 15:35 +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
On Thursday 07 Jul 2011, Bengt Rodehav wrote:
I'm using OpenJPA for persistence and would like to audit log any
changes
made to my entities. I serialize the objects to JSON (with Gson) and
store
them in a separate table
, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com wrote:
Jari,
Yes an asynchronous queue is definitely an option. I've actually used
that
approach before. It makes a lot of sense when trying to achieve high
throughput since the audit logging can then be done on lower priority
it with XML because boss wanted so, but could have
been database as well.
7.7.2011 19:49, Bengt Rodehav kirjoitti:
I actually use the same approach as Hades for createdBy, updatedBy,
createdWhen and updatedWhen. In addition to this basic audit logging I
also
want to log all historical versions
process.
-=- Jerry
On Jul 7, 2011, at 12:50 PM, Bengt Rodehav [via OpenJPA] wrote:
I actually use the same approach as Hades for createdBy, updatedBy,
createdWhen and updatedWhen. In addition to this basic audit logging I
also
want to log all historical versions together with information
Again an interesting approach. It's very similar to the way we did it in the
old days (before O/R mappers were abundant). We rolled our own O/R mapping
and also compared the previous state with the new state and saved the
difference (XML in the database). I guess the same approach can be taken if
Again an interesting solution. Although, as I wrote previously, I intend to
store the whole object and therefore don't need to keep track of what has
changed. I intend to do a JSON diff when viewing the audit log in the GUI
instead.
Your approach does, however, very elegantly solve the problem of
I'm using OpenJPA 2.0.1. All my entities share some common properties like:
- createdBy
- createdWhen
- updatedBy
- updatedWhen
- version
- id
I therefore create a superclass (EntityBase) that contains these properties.
It is an abstract class annotated with @MappedSuperclass. However, I'm not
is your application being packaged and what runtime environment are
you using?
For enhancing in Maven, you can try the openjpa-maven-plugin
http://openjpa.apache.org/enhancement-with-maven.html
but use openjpa version 2.0.1 instead of 1.2.2 as on the wiki.
-Donald
On 9/17/10 3:13 AM, Bengt
51 matches
Mail list logo
