On Sunday 10 November 2013 11:31:22 you wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 18:43:10 PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> > On 10/11/2013 M. Fioretti wrote:
> > >>>http://stop.zona-m.net/2013/11/shall-we-waste-twelve-more-years-
> > >>>promoting-free-office-suites-instead-of-open-office-formats/
> >
> > It
Using Nisus 2.0.6
This is a test of my Nisus Pro version 2.0.6
This is a text document - which I used to call a word processing document.
I am seeing if it is read by all on the OpenOffice system..
Thanks,
Dr Donald Zarlengo
‘
Don
Donald Zarlenga Ph.D.
zarle...@me.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
Thanks for the clarification of your proposal to get standard format accepted
by OpenOffice.
I will test Nisus Pro 2.0.6
Don
Donald Zarlenga Ph.D.
zarle...@me.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message (including attachments) is covered
by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 18:43:10 PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 10/11/2013 M. Fioretti wrote:
> >>>http://stop.zona-m.net/2013/11/shall-we-waste-twelve-more-years-promoting-free-office-suites-instead-of-open-office-formats/
>
> It's a complex issue. OpenOffice does advocate and promote ODF,
>
On 10/11/2013 M. Fioretti wrote:
http://stop.zona-m.net/2013/11/shall-we-waste-twelve-more-years-promoting-free-office-suites-instead-of-open-office-formats/
It's a complex issue. OpenOffice does advocate and promote ODF, project
members have prominent roles in the ODF standard maintenance and
