On 09/01/2014, users-digest-h...@openoffice.apache.org
wrote:
>>
>> with all respect, this is BAD advice. It's an easy way to accomplish
>> nothing AND get ignored or start more flamewars.
>>
You're entitled to your opinion, I am only sharing my _personal_
satisfaction to be able to receive multi
On 09/01/2014, users-digest-h...@openoffice.apache.org
wrote:
>>
>> Actually, getting digest form means you get *all* the nonsense in the
>> same
>> message, and you have to dig through the whole thing to find *anything*
>> you
>> want to read.
>>
It is only a personal preference to like to recei
On 09/01/2014, users-digest-h...@openoffice.apache.org
wrote:
>>
>> Ummm. And I can do that how??
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Maurice Howe
>> I'm retired. Go around me.
>>
Send a message to: users-digest-subscr...@openoffice.apache.org
although have noticed the following:
the only instruction that the di
Actually, getting digest form means you get *all* the nonsense in the same
message, and you have to dig through the whole thing to find *anything* you
want to read.
Then, if you want to reply to it, you have to do heavy-duty editing (or
subject everyone else to receiving the whole digest, too).
H
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 22:03:26 PM +, e-letter wrote:
> For novices to mailing lists, a suggestion: subscribe using the
> digest mode. You receive a delayed, single combined message of a
> group of messages. It is an easy and convenient way to avoid the
> nonsense polluting your e-mail inbox.
w
Ummm. And I can do that how??
Cheers,
Maurice Howe
I'm retired. Go around me.
-Original Message-
From: e-letter [mailto:inp...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 5:03 PM
To: users-dig...@openoffice.apache.org; users@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: A suggestion for those u
