On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:09:55PM -0500, Think wrote:
I seldom reply to trolls but I'll make an exception in this case.
I have been quietly watching the notes back and forth and have only once or
twice ventured into the writing and reading space of this list. Once, someone
told me I
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 08:16:10PM -0800, Carmen Putrino wrote:
Why am I getting this email?
Because you're subscribed to this list.
snip
--
Bob Holtzman
Your mail is being read by tight lipped
NSA agents who fail to see humor in Doctor
Strangelove
Key ID 8D549279
...@cox.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 3:34 PM
To: users@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Reading and Exporting spreadsheets--another commentary
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 08:16:10PM -0800, Carmen Putrino wrote:
Why am I getting this email?
Because you're subscribed to this list
To: users@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Being Good, was: RE: Reading and Exporting spreadsheets--another
commentary
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:09:55PM -0500, Think wrote:
I seldom reply to trolls but I'll make an exception in this case.
I have been quietly watching the notes back and forth
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 12:19 AM
To: users@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Being Good, was: RE: Reading and Exporting spreadsheets--another
commentary
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 23:09:55 -0500
Think thinkta...@gmail.com wrote:
Once, someone told me I
digressed too much
On Tue, 7 Jan 2014, Think wrote:
And again, we have the concept of ad hominem. Attacking me voids
your argument. This is not about me. This is about the behavior of
those who post on this listserv.
minor correction: attacking a person does not void an argument.
suppose I say, p implies q, q
Greetings All,
Here's (imho) another example of the symptoms of the coding flaws inherent
in the present OOo software suite. You do something according to one set of
seemingly-valid protocols get one result (or, perhaps, non-result), then
you do it according to another set of also-valid
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Anthony J. Rudgers
anthonyrudg...@att.net wrote:
Greetings All,
Here's (imho) another example of the symptoms of the coding flaws inherent
in the present OOo software suite. You do something according to one set of
seemingly-valid protocols get one result
On Monday 06 January 2014 18:28:15 you wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Anthony J. Rudgers
anthonyrudg...@att.net wrote:
Greetings All,
Here's (imho) another example of the symptoms of the coding flaws
inherent in the present OOo software suite. You do something
according to
Why am I getting this email?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 6, 2014, at 7:28 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Anthony J. Rudgers
anthonyrudg...@att.net wrote:
Greetings All,
Here's (imho) another example of the symptoms of the coding flaws inherent
in
: Monday, January 06, 2014 5:07 PM
To: Arthur Schwarz; users@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: Anthony Rudgers
Subject: Re: Reading and Exporting spreadsheets--another commentary
Greetings All,
Here's (imho) another example of the symptoms of the coding flaws inherent
in the present OOo software suite. You
10:28 PM
To: users@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Reading and Exporting spreadsheets--another commentary
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Anthony J. Rudgers
anthonyrudg...@att.net wrote:
Greetings All,
Here's (imho) another example of the symptoms of the coding flaws inherent
Who is the moderator of this list?
Thanks.
Brenda Hart Neihouse
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:rabas...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 11:46 PM
To: users@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Reading and Exporting spreadsheets--another commentary
On Jan 6, 2014
and Exporting spreadsheets--another commentary
Greetings All,
Here's (imho) another example of the symptoms of the coding flaws inherent
in the present OOo software suite. You do something according to one set of
seemingly-valid protocols get one result (or, perhaps, non-result), then
you do
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 23:09:55 -0500
Think thinkta...@gmail.com wrote:
Once, someone told me I
digressed too much and that I was wrong for having bothered everyone with my
verbiage.
They were right. Also, I'm a 'disabled' person and I wouldn't and don't
*ever* want
you yelling at anyone for
15 matches
Mail list logo
