Re: [was:] Double line spacing

> On Aug 6, 2016, at 17:29, Brian Barker wrote: > >> 1 virus 2 viri 3 virii 4 viriv. .. 9 virix > > Ho, ho! A good one! original credit goes to Rob Slade [9 was my own addition] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Slade — jt - j...@jt-mj.net With sufficient

Re: [was:] Double line spacing

At 17:53 06/08/2016 -0400, Felmon Davis wrote: just a quick (last) word: I take dictionaries to describe usage, not prescribe it ... True. ... thus they lag actual usage. Hmm... Brian Barker - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [was:] Double line spacing

On Sat, 6 Aug 2016, Brian Barker wrote: At 13:43 06/08/2016 -0700, Jim McLaughlin wrote: I suggest that we agree to disagree ... You can disagree without my needing to agree that you can. If agreeing to disagree means that I accept that "virii" is as arguable as "viruses", then I don't.

Re: [was:] Double line spacing

At 13:43 06/08/2016 -0700, Jim McLaughlin wrote: I suggest that we agree to disagree ... You can disagree without my needing to agree that you can. If agreeing to disagree means that I accept that "virii" is as arguable as "viruses", then I don't. ... each knowing that we are each

Re: [was:] Double line spacing

At 17:19 06/08/2016 -0400, Julian Thomas wrote: 1 virus 2 viri 3 virii 4 viriv. .. 9 virix Ho, ho! A good one! Brian Barker - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands,