Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
Pierre wrote:
Richard wrote:
I have been a champion of OOo for more years than most of you have
even used the programme. There are serious issues with OOo 3 and
that's a fact and NOT ONE OF THE AH's REPLYING HERE CAN GIVE ME AN
ANSWER AS TO WHY IT SAVES SLOW ONTO A
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
My first computer was an IMSAI 8080, which I built from a kit* in Nov
1976. Everything, memory, I/O etc., was extra. I also used cassettes
with it, but later was able to use paper tape on my M35 ASR Teletype
Ugly Me wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Dave Post davep...@earthlink.net
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
Ok, I'll play. How about a DEC PDP-8 with 4K (12-bit) memory locations
and a teletype for reading
- Original Message -
From: Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
On Thursday 12 March 2009, Ugly Me wrote:
- Original Message -
From: James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com
- Original Message -
From: James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 10:15 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
*A kit consisted of bare boards and bags of parts that had to be
soldered to the boards. The whole thing
- Original Message -
From: Gordon gbpli...@gmail.com
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 1:37 PM
Subject: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
Ugly Me wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Gregory L. Forster gforst.1...@sbcglobal.net
To: users@openoffice.org
- Original Message -
From: Gordon gbpli...@gmail.com
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 2:27 PM
Subject: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
Barbara Duprey wrote:
Gordon wrote:
Ugly Me wrote:
- Original Message - From: Gregory L. Forster
gforst.1
- Original Message -
From: Robert Hodgins ehodg...@telusplanet.net
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
Hmmm. My Commodore 64 had a tape recorder
My Timex Sinclair saved to a tape recorder. Never could get
- Original Message -
From: Dave Post davep...@earthlink.net
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
Ok, I'll play. How about a DEC PDP-8 with 4K (12-bit) memory locations
and a teletype for reading/writing programs
- Original Message -
From: JOE Conner joeconner2...@gmail.com
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
Dave Post wrote:
Ok, I'll play. How about a DEC PDP-8 with 4K (12-bit) memory locations
and a teletype
- Original Message -
From: James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
My first computer was an IMSAI 8080, which I built from a kit* in Nov
1976. Everything, memory, I/O etc., was extra
- Original Message -
From: James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
Gordon wrote:
Hmmm. My Commodore 64 had a tape recorder
Better known as a Commie 64. ;-)
So
- Original Message -
From: James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
Robert Hodgins wrote:
Hmmm. My Commodore 64 had a tape recorder
My Timex Sinclair saved to a tape recorder
- Original Message -
From: jonathon jonathon.bl...@gmail.com
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 10:22 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 22:12, David B Teague wrote:
and the Pascal System editor to type my papers
I have this cool ad of William Shatner peddling a Vic-20
My son called it the Victim-20
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.org
On Thursday 12 March 2009, JOE Conner wrote:
I have this cool ad of William Shatner peddling a Vic-20
My son called it the Victim-20
I looked at it. I think your son was correct.
--
Cheers, Gene
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use
On Thursday 12 March 2009, Ugly Me wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Dave Post davep...@earthlink.net
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
Ok, I'll play. How about a DEC PDP-8 with 4K (12-bit) memory locations
On Thursday 12 March 2009, Ugly Me wrote:
- Original Message -
From: James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
Robert Hodgins wrote:
Hmmm. My Commodore 64 had a tape recorder
My
On 12/03/2009 22:14, Ugly Me wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Gordon gbpli...@gmail.com
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 2:27 PM
Subject: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
Barbara Duprey wrote:
Gordon wrote:
Ugly Me wrote:
- Original
Ugly Me wrote:
- Original Message -
From: James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
My first computer was an IMSAI 8080, which I built from a kit* in Nov
1976. Everything
, 2009 2:27 PM
Subject: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
Barbara Duprey wrote:
Gordon wrote:
Ugly Me wrote:
- Original Message - From: Gregory L. Forster
gforst.1...@sbcglobal.net
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 5:19 PM
Subject: Re
On Saturday 07 March 2009, Ugly Me wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Gregory L. Forster gforst.1...@sbcglobal.net
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
WOW! I tweaked up the memory as suggested:
Use for OpenOffice.org
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 22:12, David B Teague wrote:
and the Pascal System editor to type my papers.
There is one feature of that editor that I haven't seen on any other
text editor, or word processor, that I really miss.
jonathon
jonathon wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 22:12, David B Teague wrote:
and the Pascal System editor to type my papers.
There is one feature of that editor that I haven't seen on any other
text editor, or word processor, that I really miss.
jonathon
I am intrigued. What is that feature
David B Teague wrote:
I tried the memory settings mentioned in the link. These settings are
consonant with settings mentioned in other posts.
After a reboot, or after not having OO.o loaded for a while (not
measured, but longer than a half hour), the OO.o start time for a 50K
odt file is 17
Ugly Me wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Gregory L. Forster gforst.1...@sbcglobal.net
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
WOW! I tweaked up the memory as suggested:
Use for OpenOffice.org - 256mb
Memory per
Gordon wrote:
Ugly Me wrote:
- Original Message - From: Gregory L. Forster
gforst.1...@sbcglobal.net
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
WOW! I tweaked up the memory as suggested:
Use for OpenOffice.org - 256mb
Barbara Duprey wrote:
Gordon wrote:
Ugly Me wrote:
- Original Message - From: Gregory L. Forster
gforst.1...@sbcglobal.net
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
WOW! I tweaked up the memory as suggested:
Use
Hmmm. My Commodore 64 had a tape recorder
My Timex Sinclair saved to a tape recorder. Never could get the thing to
load a program, though.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional
Ok, I'll play. How about a DEC PDP-8 with 4K (12-bit) memory locations
and a teletype for reading/writing programs on paper tape? Or a Wang
programmable desktop calculator with Nixie-tube display and the
ability to read up to 2 (Yes! 2! We were agog.) cards on which you'd
record programs
Dave Post wrote:
Ok, I'll play. How about a DEC PDP-8 with 4K (12-bit) memory locations
and a teletype for reading/writing programs on paper tape? Or a Wang
programmable desktop calculator with Nixie-tube display and the
ability to read up to 2 (Yes! 2! We were agog.) cards on which you'd
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 14:51 -0400, Dave Post wrote:
Ok, I'll play. How about a DEC PDP-8 with 4K (12-bit) memory locations
and a teletype for reading/writing programs on paper tape? Or a Wang
programmable desktop calculator with Nixie-tube display and the
ability to read up to 2 (Yes! 2!
Barbara Duprey wrote:
Gordon wrote:
Ugly Me wrote:
- Original Message - From: Gregory L. Forster
gforst.1...@sbcglobal.net
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
WOW! I tweaked up the memory as suggested:
Use
Gordon wrote:
Hmmm. My Commodore 64 had a tape recorder
Better known as a Commie 64. ;-)
--
Use OpenOffice.org http://www.openoffice.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional
Robert Hodgins wrote:
Hmmm. My Commodore 64 had a tape recorder
My Timex Sinclair saved to a tape recorder. Never could get the thing to
load a program, though.
Write only storage? ;-)
--
Use OpenOffice.org http://www.openoffice.org
Dave Post wrote:
Ok, I'll play. How about a DEC PDP-8 with 4K (12-bit) memory locations
and a teletype for reading/writing programs on paper tape? Or a Wang
programmable desktop calculator with Nixie-tube display and the
ability to read up to 2 (Yes! 2! We were agog.) cards on which you'd
Robert Hodgins wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 14:51 -0400, Dave Post wrote:
Ok, I'll play. How about a DEC PDP-8 with 4K (12-bit) memory locations
and a teletype for reading/writing programs on paper tape? Or a Wang
programmable desktop calculator with Nixie-tube display and the
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 16:18 -0400, James Knott wrote:
Robert Hodgins wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 14:51 -0400, Dave Post wrote:
Ok, I'll play. How about a DEC PDP-8 with 4K (12-bit) memory locations
and a teletype for reading/writing programs on paper tape? Or a Wang
programmable
Gordon wrote:
David B Teague wrote:
I tried the memory settings mentioned in the link. These settings are
consonant with settings mentioned in other posts.
After a reboot, or after not having OO.o loaded for a while (not
measured, but longer than a half hour), the OO.o start time for a 50K
Barbara Duprey wrote:
Gordon wrote:
Ugly Me wrote:
- Original Message - From: Gregory L. Forster
gforst.1...@sbcglobal.net
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
WOW! I tweaked up the memory as suggested:
Use
WOW! I tweaked up the memory as suggested:
Use for OpenOffice.org - 256mb
Memory per object - 128 mb
OpenOffice really sizzles now. I have an AMD Athlon X2 dual core 64bit
CPU at 2.6 Ghz with 4Gig memory and WinXP Pro SP3. I have to try that
on my Ubuntu machine (1.6Gig Celeron with 512Meg)
- Original Message -
From: Gregory L. Forster gforst.1...@sbcglobal.net
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
WOW! I tweaked up the memory as suggested:
Use for OpenOffice.org - 256mb
Memory per object - 128 mb
David B Teague wrote:
Gordon wrote:
David B Teague wrote:
Gordon wrote:
David B Teague wrote:
OO.o 3.0.0 was slow on startup, and 3.0.1 is also slow to start,
slower than 2.4, even with the QuickStarter --
Have you tweaked the memory settings in Tools-Options?
3.01 starts as fast if not
Richard wrote:
I have been a champion of OOo for more years than most of you have even
used the programme. There are serious issues with OOo 3 and that's a
fact and NOT ONE OF THE AH's REPLYING HERE CAN GIVE ME AN ANSWER AS TO
WHY IT SAVES SLOW ONTO A FILE SERVER and OPENS SLOW FROM A FILE
Pierre wrote:
Richard wrote:
I have been a champion of OOo for more years than most of you have
even used the programme. There are serious issues with OOo 3 and
that's a fact and NOT ONE OF THE AH's REPLYING HERE CAN GIVE ME AN
ANSWER AS TO WHY IT SAVES SLOW ONTO A FILE SERVER and OPENS
Gordon wrote:
David B Teague wrote:
Gordon wrote:
David B Teague wrote:
Gordon wrote:
David B Teague wrote:
OO.o 3.0.0 was slow on startup, and 3.0.1 is also slow to start,
slower than 2.4, even with the QuickStarter --
Have you tweaked the memory settings in Tools-Options?
3.01 starts
David B Teague wrote:
OO.o 3.0.0 was slow on startup, and 3.0.1 is also slow to start, slower
than 2.4, even with the QuickStarter --
Have you tweaked the memory settings in Tools-Options?
3.01 starts as fast if not faster here than Office 2007 on Vista...
Gordon wrote:
David B Teague wrote:
OO.o 3.0.0 was slow on startup, and 3.0.1 is also slow to start,
slower than 2.4, even with the QuickStarter --
Have you tweaked the memory settings in Tools-Options?
3.01 starts as fast if not faster here than Office 2007 on Vista...
The behavior is
David B Teague wrote:
Gordon wrote:
David B Teague wrote:
OO.o 3.0.0 was slow on startup, and 3.0.1 is also slow to start,
slower than 2.4, even with the QuickStarter --
Have you tweaked the memory settings in Tools-Options?
3.01 starts as fast if not faster here than Office 2007 on
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
snip
(a) You have no idea how long anyone here has been using OOo. I've been
using StarOffice for years before there was an OpenOffice. In 2007 your
first post stated you'd been using OOo for 4 - 5 years. That means you
started in late 2001 at the earliest; I
I like the new ver. 3... It can open MS docx files... Save a lot of money,
didn't have to buy MSO 2007... Great product..
--- On Thu, 3/5/09, Gordon gbpli...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Gordon gbpli...@gmail.com
Subject: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
To: users@openoffice.org
Date: Thursday, March 5
Thanks for this - the Windows memory settings below make it quick to load on
Win XP too.
G
- Original Message -
From: David B Teague davidbtea...@verizon.net
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
Gordon wrote
Gordon wrote:
David B Teague wrote:
Gordon wrote:
David B Teague wrote:
OO.o 3.0.0 was slow on startup, and 3.0.1 is also slow to start,
slower than 2.4, even with the QuickStarter --
Have you tweaked the memory settings in Tools-Options?
3.01 starts as fast if not faster here than
Richard wrote:
OOo3 is the worst version ever and like Netscape ver 4 a complete
disaster that will loose countless users and loyal supporters.
I am officially removing OOo 3 from my office 7 machines, I have used
OOo since ver 1 but can no longer support its very slow operation, my
staff
Twayne wrote:
Richard wrote:
OOo3 is the worst version ever and like Netscape ver 4 a complete
disaster that will loose countless users and loyal supporters.
I am officially removing OOo 3 from my office 7 machines, I have used
OOo since ver 1 but can no longer support its very slow operation,
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:49:40 +0200
Came this utterance formulated by Richard to my mailbox:
Richard wrote:
OOo3 is the worst version ever and like Netscape ver 4 a complete
disaster that will loose countless users and loyal supporters.
I am officially removing OOo 3 from my office 7
OOo3 is the worst version ever and like Netscape ver 4 a complete
disaster that will loose countless users and loyal supporters.
I am officially removing OOo 3 from my office 7 machines, I have used
OOo since ver 1 but can no longer support its very slow operation, my
staff are
- Original Message -
From: Pierre openoff...@finalfiler.com
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 5:23 AM
Subject: Re: [users] ver 3 is rubbish.
Richard wrote:
OOo3 is the worst version ever and like Netscape ver 4 a complete
disaster that will loose
Richard wrote:
OOo3 is the worst version ever and like Netscape ver 4 a complete
disaster that will loose countless users and loyal supporters.
I am officially removing OOo 3 from my office 7 machines, I have used
OOo since ver 1 but can no longer support its very slow operation, my
staff
Richard wrote:
OOo3 is the worst version ever and like Netscape ver 4 a complete
disaster that will loose countless users and loyal supporters.
I am officially removing OOo 3 from my office 7 machines, I have used
OOo since ver 1 but can no longer support its very slow operation, my
staff
60 matches
Mail list logo
