Re: [users] OpenOffice 2.4 on Ubuntu Hardy beta

2008-04-03 Thread Pierre
Fred A. Miller wrote: Wish I could help you, but I tried Kubuntu 8.4 beta a few days ago and found it useless at this point. I never did get to look at OO on it. Fred, Did you look to the Ubuntu forums for a bit of help? That said and at the risk of going OT, I found the upgrade to

Re: [users] OpenOffice 2.4 on Ubuntu Hardy beta

2008-04-03 Thread Fred A. Miller
Pierre wrote: Fred A. Miller wrote: Wish I could help you, but I tried Kubuntu 8.4 beta a few days ago and found it useless at this point. I never did get to look at OO on it. Fred, Did you look to the Ubuntu forums for a bit of help? That said and at the risk of going OT, I found the

Re: [users] OpenOffice 2.4 on Ubuntu Hardy beta

2008-04-02 Thread Johnny Rosenberg
2008/3/31, Pat Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I recently installed the Ubuntu Hardy beta, and I was hoping to get OOo 2.4, but it still says 2.3. In fact the only change I noticed is that the Save icon now doesn't gray out when I do a save. It's

Re: [users] OpenOffice 2.4 on Ubuntu Hardy beta

2008-04-01 Thread Pat Brown
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I recently installed the Ubuntu Hardy beta, and I was hoping to get OOo 2.4, but it still says 2.3. In fact the only change I noticed is that the Save icon now doesn't gray out when I do a save. It's always showing 'active'. - -- Pat Brown

[users] OpenOffice 2.4 on Ubuntu Hardy beta

2008-03-31 Thread M Henri Day
Perhaps this is more an Ubuntu query than an OOo one, but I'm hoping you will bear with me. I've recently upgraded to Hardy beta, which I was told on good authority uses (an Ubuntuised version of) the OOo 2.4.0 release candidate by default. Indeeed, when I check my programme manager, I see this to

Re: [users] OpenOffice 2.4 on Ubuntu Hardy beta

2008-03-31 Thread Fred A. Miller
M Henri Day wrote: Perhaps this is more an Ubuntu query than an OOo one, but I'm hoping you will bear with me. I've recently upgraded to Hardy beta, which I was told on good authority uses (an Ubuntuised version of) the OOo 2.4.0 release candidate by default. Indeeed, when I check my programme