Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
See vzctl set --name
Well thats a nice start.
Now, to follow on from that great progress, how do I get it so that the
directory where the root filesystem lives corresponds to the name I set
instead of the numeric VEID?
Thanks!
Steve Wray wrote:
Hi there,
I'm
Steve Wray wrote:
Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
See vzctl set --name
Well thats a nice start.
Now, to follow on from that great progress, how do I get it so that
the directory where the root filesystem lives corresponds to the name
I set instead of the numeric VEID?
No standard way.
I guess
Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
Steve Wray wrote:
Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
See vzctl set --name
Well thats a nice start.
Now, to follow on from that great progress, how do I get it so that
the directory where the root filesystem lives corresponds to the name
I set instead of the numeric
Steve Wray wrote:
Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
Steve Wray wrote:
Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
See vzctl set --name
Well thats a nice start.
Now, to follow on from that great progress, how do I get it so that
the directory where the root filesystem lives corresponds to the name
I set
Steve Wray wrote:
Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
See vzctl set --name
Well thats a nice start.
Now, to follow on from that great progress, how do I get it so that
the directory where the root filesystem lives corresponds to the name
I set instead of the numeric VEID?
Thanks!
There seems to be
Steve Wray wrote:
Steve Wray wrote:
There seems to be a slight inconsistency across the tool set here.
vzctl does respect the given 'name' however vzquota does not appear to
and seems to require the numeric id.
Quite true. Did you check the bugtracker for the project, or log that as
a bug?
Gregor Mosheh wrote:
Steve Wray wrote:
Steve Wray wrote:
There seems to be a slight inconsistency across the tool set here.
vzctl does respect the given 'name' however vzquota does not appear
to and seems to require the numeric id.
Quite true. Did you check the bugtracker for the project,
On 15/08/2007 11:02 AM, Steve Hodges wrote:
On 14/08/2007 7:01 PM, Steve Hodges wrote:
The servers I'm trying to put onto a single hardware node each have 2
ethernet interfaces.
OK, after extensive testing I have narrowed down what I believe to be
the cause of the problem. The VE always
