On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 21:02 +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Kir
This can easily be solved by adding a 1: prefix to the version
number. This is the usual debian practice in these kind of situations.
I was always thinking bumping the epoch is kind of a last resort thing
for situations where
On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 22:30 +0400, Andrew Vagin wrote:
Hello Roman,
Could you file a bug to bugzilla.openvz.org and assign it to me?
Sure: https://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2926
I discovered some other problems related to that that I'd like to
discuss still here on the list.
