Re: [Users] OpenVZ vs. vserver

2007-03-24 Thread Kir Kolyshkin
As per my experience porting to powerpc platform, OpenVZ is easily portable, i.e. it is 95% platform-independent code (not counting the checkpointing functionality, which IS very platform-specific). So, if somebody needs OpenVZ for some currently unsupported platform (say, ARM), they can

[Users] OpenVZ in xen

2007-03-24 Thread Daniel Bauer
Hi @all, I've done some first steps with OpenVZ. I like the speed and that it use less resources from host as xen. But the only distribution which works from the box is SuSE. Now many of my boxes run SuSE with xen, but I like to run also OpenVZ. Is it possible to run OpenVZ in a domU from

Re: [Users] linux-2.6.20-openvz tree

2007-03-24 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 23.03.2007 10:01, Kirill Korotaev wrote: This was possible for years in OpenVZ: man vzctl http://openvz.org/documentation/mans/vzctl.8 Network devices control parameters --netdev_add name move network device from VE0 to a specified VE --netdev_del name delete network device

AW: [Users] OpenVZ vs. vserver

2007-03-24 Thread Dietmar Maurer
Darryl Ross wrote: I've not been able to get migrations working in openvz at all. I just end up using the same process I use under linux-vserver to migrate guests between machines: rsync once, rsync a second time (to reduce the time stopped), stop the guest, resync a third time,

Re: [Users] linux-2.6.20-openvz tree

2007-03-24 Thread Kir Kolyshkin
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: On 23.03.2007 10:01, Kirill Korotaev wrote: This was possible for years in OpenVZ: man vzctl http://openvz.org/documentation/mans/vzctl.8 Network devices control parameters --netdev_add name move network device from VE0 to a specified VE --netdev_del name