Re: [Users] sysctl to hide VE processes from HN ps?

2008-07-21 Thread Kir Kolyshkin
Gregor Mosheh wrote: I was glad to hear about bug 511. I am running 2.6.24-ovz005 and was surprised to see that I had this great new feature. But it doesn't seem to be working. Maybe I'm doing it wrong? # sysctl kernel.pid_ns_hide_child=1 A 'ps ax' or 'ls /proc' shows the same thing

Re: [Users] Netatalk in kernel?

2008-07-21 Thread Kir Kolyshkin
Paul wrote: Who would I ask about getting the AppleTalk module built in the normal openvz kernel? I know I can build a whole new kernel but it would be great to just be able to update with normal openvz community kernel. Does anyone know how I can just build that module for the current one?

Re: [Users] sysctl to hide VE processes from HN ps?

2008-07-21 Thread Roberto Mello
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 6:13 AM, Kir Kolyshkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Processes are hidden for all containers started _after_ you have changed the setting. Is 2.6.24 considered stable yet? Roberto -- http://blog.divisiblebyfour.org/ ___ Users

Re: [Users] sysctl to hide VE processes from HN ps?

2008-07-21 Thread Gregor Mosheh
Kir Kolyshkin wrote: # sysctl kernel.pid_ns_hide_child=1 Processes are hidden for all containers started _after_ you have changed the setting. A, I get it. Too bad it can't change the view more dynamically. I'd love to be able to toggle the view of HN or HN+VPSs. But I'll likely not

Re: [Users] 2.6.24 stable

2008-07-21 Thread John Drescher
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Gregor Mosheh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Roberto Mello wrote: Is 2.6.24 considered stable yet? When I installed it three weeks ago, it was considered development. I've been using it with DRBD, NIC bonding, and a 3ware 9650 controller for the last three weeks