On 24/07/12 12:15, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I've blogged yesterday about the recent work I've done to add oVirt support
> to GNOME Boxes ( https://live.gnome.org/Boxes/ ) using oVirt REST API:
>
> http://cfergeau.blogspot.fr/2012/07/outside-boxes.html
>
That's great, looks good.
>
maybe it's a libvirt problem , since my nodes have used oVirt Node Hypervisor
2.2.2-2.2.fc16
engine:
libvirt-0.9.11.4-3.fc17.x86_64
node:
libvirt-0.9.6-4.fc16.x86_64
storage:
No local fs, I have two Domain , one is using NFS fs, the other is GlusterFS
mount by NFS.
Both have the problem
[roo
> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 00:32:15 +0200
> From: dne...@redhat.com
> To: users@ovirt.org
> Subject: Re: [Users] Latest RPMs, etc?
>
> Hi,
>
> On 07/25/2012 11:44 PM, Nicholas Kesick wrote:
> > Just to confirm, as I'd like to contribute some testing (since from the
> > weekly meeting it seems som
Hi,
On 07/25/2012 11:44 PM, Nicholas Kesick wrote:
Just to confirm, as I'd like to contribute some testing (since from the
weekly meeting it seems some is needed), are all of the latest released
versions here?
http://www.ovirt.org/releases/beta/fedora/17/ and here for ovirt-node?
http://www.ovi
Correction.Just to confirm, as I'd like to contribute some testing (since from
the weekly meeting it seems some is needed), are all of the latest released
versions -for testing- here?
http://www.ovirt.org/releases/beta/fedora/17/ and here for ovirt-node?
http://www.ovirt.org/releases/beta/bina
Just to confirm, as I'd like to contribute some testing (since from the weekly
meeting it seems some is needed), are all of the latest released versions
here?http://www.ovirt.org/releases/beta/fedora/17/ and here for ovirt-node?
http://www.ovirt.org/releases/beta/binary/ Two additional com
On 07/25/2012 09:46 PM, Brent Bolin wrote:
I have seen this. Can give it a try.
At this point I'm not sure if it's a problem with my configuration.
Or making console connections with either vnc or spice. The ports are
clearly running -
netstat -an|grep 590
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:5900
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:58:48PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> Thanks, I just wanted to make sure it's not libvirt that does this.
Pardon me, I still suspect libvirt... Which version thereof do you have
installed?
Which storage is used for the vm image - local fs, right?
would you
strace
I have seen this. Can give it a try.
At this point I'm not sure if it's a problem with my configuration.
Or making console connections with either vnc or spice. The ports are
clearly running -
netstat -an|grep 590
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:59000.0.0.0:*
LISTEN
tcp
would it be relevant for you to try the 3.1 beta?
it has this which should cover your 'all in one' needs:
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Feature/AllInOne
On 07/25/2012 06:52 PM, Brent Bolin wrote:
Thanks David for your reply -
I have completely flushed all iptables rules 'iptables --flush" -
iptab
Thanks David for your reply -
I have completely flushed all iptables rules 'iptables --flush" -
iptables -L -v -n
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 1775K packets, 627M bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
destination
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
pkts bytes t
Due to some critical issues that are still outstanding, we've decided to
delay the release of oVirt 3.1 by 2 weeks. We are now targeting
2012-08-08 for the release.
For details on the issues currently blocking the release, please see the
bugs listed here[1].
Thanks,
Ofer Schreiber
oVirt Releas
Hi Brent,
first guess: have a look if your iptables setup allow connection to the
qemu processes. RHEV 3.0 documentation (publicly accesible) says that a
host needs these ports open:
port 22 for SSH,
ports 5634 to 6166 for guest console connections,
port 16514 for libvirt
Thanks, I just wanted to make sure it's not libvirt that does this.
On 07/25/2012 04:44 PM, T-Sinjon wrote:
> both engine and node dynamic_ownership are 0
>
> On 25 Jul, 2012, at 5:56 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>
>> On 07/25/2012 10:36 AM, T-Sinjon wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear everyone:
>>>
>>> Descrip
On Wed 25 Jul 2012 12:35:41 AM PDT, Ofer Schreiber wrote:
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Gordon"
To: "Jason Brooks"
Cc: "Ofer Schreiber" , users@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 8:01:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Users] W
both engine and node dynamic_ownership are 0
On 25 Jul, 2012, at 5:56 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On 07/25/2012 10:36 AM, T-Sinjon wrote:
>>
>> Dear everyone:
>>
>> Description
>> When i create a vm , the vm owner is vdsm:kvm(36:36)
>>
>> when i start a vm , the vm owner change to qemu:qemu
About 6 months ago I asked on this list if it was possible to install
ovirt on a single host. Thread got long and winded and lost interest.
Started looking at the project again about two days ago. What I
really didn't understand was using a base Fedora install. Installing
vdsm and then installi
vdsm service requires 36:36 permissions on the dir (storage side) else
it will fail with permission error.
even if you give full r/w to all, but the owner of the dir is not vdsm
you will fail with permission error (you will be able to mount as root
or any other user but not vdsm).
Can you please
On 07/25/2012 03:16 PM, Rahman Duran wrote:
> Here is the last packet nfs server send to vdsm before web admin gives
> error:
It looks like the file is owned by nobody:nobody, but it should be owned
by vdsm:kvm (36:36). If the file is owned by 36:36 in your NFS server,
then make sure that the vdsm
did you give 36:36 permissions to the dir? when you manually try to
mount are you using root or vdsm user?
On 07/25/2012 03:57 PM, Rahman Duran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am getting this when I try to create a ISO/NFS domain:
>
> Permission settings on the specified path do not allow access to the
> st
Hi,
I am getting this when I try to create a ISO/NFS domain:
Permission settings on the specified path do not allow access to the
storage. Verify permission settings on the specified storage path.: 'path =
/rhev/data-center/mnt/79.xxx.xxx.xxx:_volumes_archives_proxmox_template_iso'
I can manuall
On 07/25/2012 10:36 AM, T-Sinjon wrote:
>
> Dear everyone:
>
> Description
> When i create a vm , the vm owner is vdsm:kvm(36:36)
>
> when i start a vm , the vm owner change to qemu:qemu(107:107)
> -rw-rw. 1 qemu qemu 107374182400 Jul 25 2012
> d1e6b671-6b48-4964-9c56-22847e9b83df
> -rw-r-
25 jul 2012 kl. 11.01 skrev Juan Hernandez:
On 07/25/2012 10:52 AM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
1. Stop the engine service: systemctl stop ovirt-engine.service
2. Remove jboss-as, but not its dependencies: rpm -e jboss-as --nodeps
3. Make sure that the /usr/share/jboss-as directory is empty. If it i
On 07/25/2012 10:01 AM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
On 07/25/2012 10:52 AM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
1. Stop the engine service: systemctl stop ovirt-engine.service
2. Remove jboss-as, but not its dependencies: rpm -e jboss-as --nodeps
3. Make sure that the /usr/share/jboss-as directory is empty. If it
On 07/25/2012 11:01 AM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
> I have a work-around, but something is amiss with the latest jboss update.
You are right, using 7.1.1-3 should work as well.
> # systemctl stop ovirt-engine.service
> # rpm -e --nodeps jboss-as
> # nano /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates.repo
> [updates
On 07/25/2012 10:52 AM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
>
> 1. Stop the engine service: systemctl stop ovirt-engine.service
>
>
> 2. Remove jboss-as, but not its dependencies: rpm -e jboss-as --nodeps
>
> 3. Make sure that the /usr/share/jboss-as directory is empty. If it is
> not clean it manually.
>
>
I have a work-around, but something is amiss with the latest jboss update.
# systemctl stop ovirt-engine.service
# rpm -e --nodeps jboss-as
# nano /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates.repo
[updates]
name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch - Updates
failovermethod=priority
#baseurl=http://download.fedorapro
1. Stop the engine service: systemctl stop ovirt-engine.service
2. Remove jboss-as, but not its dependencies: rpm -e jboss-as --nodeps
3. Make sure that the /usr/share/jboss-as directory is empty. If it is
not clean it manually.
4. Re-install the jboss-as package: yum install jboss-as
5. Star
On 07/25/2012 09:45 AM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
On 07/25/2012 10:37 AM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
On 07/25/2012 10:22 AM, jose garcia wrote:
On 07/25/2012 09:05 AM, Ofer Schreiber wrote:
- Original Message -
Good evening,
I had installed the 3.1 beta version. After an update of Fedo
On 07/25/2012 10:37 AM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
> On 07/25/2012 10:22 AM, jose garcia wrote:
>> On 07/25/2012 09:05 AM, Ofer Schreiber wrote:
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
Good evening,
I had installed the 3.1 beta version. After an update of Fedora
17,
the
On 07/25/2012 10:22 AM, jose garcia wrote:
> On 07/25/2012 09:05 AM, Ofer Schreiber wrote:
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> Good evening,
>>>
>>> I had installed the 3.1 beta version. After an update of Fedora
>>> 17,
>>> the portal does not show any links. I reckon that ovirt-eng
Dear everyone:
Description
When i create a vm , the vm owner is vdsm:kvm(36:36)
when i start a vm , the vm owner change to qemu:qemu(107:107)
-rw-rw. 1 qemu qemu 107374182400 Jul 25 2012
d1e6b671-6b48-4964-9c56-22847e9b83df
-rw-r--r--. 1 vdsm kvm 269 Jul 25 2012
d1e6b671-6b48-4
On 07/25/2012 09:05 AM, Ofer Schreiber wrote:
- Original Message -
Good evening,
I had installed the 3.1 beta version. After an update of Fedora
17,
the portal does not show any links. I reckon that ovirt-engine
version
has been upgraded to 3.1.0-1.fc17.
Have I lost
- Original Message -
> Good evening,
>
> I had installed the 3.1 beta version. After an update of Fedora
> 17,
> the portal does not show any links. I reckon that ovirt-engine
> version
> has been upgraded to 3.1.0-1.fc17.
>
> Have I lost all the information in the database?
- Original Message -
> Good evening,
>
> I had installed the 3.1 beta version. After an update of Fedora
> 17,
> the portal does not show any links. I reckon that ovirt-engine
> version
> has been upgraded to 3.1.0-1.fc17.
>
> Have I lost all the information in the databa
- Original Message -
>
>
> - Original Message -
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Steve Gordon"
> > > To: "Jason Brooks"
> > > Cc: "Ofer Schreiber" , users@ovirt.org
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 8:01:05 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Users] Wondering about
- Original Message -
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Steve Gordon"
> > To: "Jason Brooks"
> > Cc: "Ofer Schreiber" , users@ovirt.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 8:01:05 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Users] Wondering about updating ovirt from 3.0 to 3.1
> >
> > - Origina
37 matches
Mail list logo
