[ovirt-users] Re: Failed to Activated Host

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:37 PM, carl langlois wrote: > Hi > > Today i had plan to start upgrading my installation to the latest 4.2. As > i was already on a 4.2.x version i have figured it will be easy .. > well.guess what i have having trouble re-activating one of the freshly > upgraded host.

[ovirt-users] More USB device redirection

We have more USB devices redir (There are 8)，But oVirt supports only 6. How should I configure it. /etc/engine-config/engine-config.properties NumberOfUSBSlots.validValues=0..6 This 0..6 modify 0..8 engine-config -s NumberOfUSBSlots=8 engine-config -g NumberOfUSBSlots NumberOfUSBSlots: 8

[ovirt-users] Drive letter / scsi id not consistent

Hi, Managing disks in the ovirt gui seems completely error prone since the GUI ordering does not seem to be used in any practical way. The scsi ID's are not exposed via the GUI either, so if you have 2 drives of the same size on NFS there's no way to identify which is which without resorting

[ovirt-users] Re: Cannot start VM due to no active snapshot.

Benny, Thanks for the response! I don't think I found the right snapshot ID in the logs, but I was able to track down an ID in the images table. I've inserted that ID as the active VM in the snapshots table and it now shows an Active VM with Status:Up disks in my snapshots view in the WebUI.

[ovirt-users] Failed to Activated Host

Hi Today i had plan to start upgrading my installation to the latest 4.2. As i was already on a 4.2.x version i have figured it will be easy .. well.guess what i have having trouble re-activating one of the freshly upgraded host. So here is the resume. My setup have 3 hosts that are also part of

[ovirt-users] Re: metrics

-- SHIRLY RADCO BI SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER Red Hat Israel TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 6:22 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: > Shirly, does the ovirt metrics ansible playbooks install and configure the >

[ovirt-users] Re: metrics

Shirly, does the ovirt metrics ansible playbooks install and configure the openshift repos from https://github.com/ViaQ/Main/blob/master/centos7-viaq.repo ? Please try ansible 2.5 On 07/19/2018 09:15 AM, supo...@logicworks.pt wrote: Sorry, wrong server # yum search atomic-openshift ...

[ovirt-users] Re: metrics

Sorry, wrong server # yum search atomic-openshift ... === N/S matched: atomic-openshift atomic-openshift-utils.noarch : Atomic OpenShift Utilities # yum repolist repo id repo name status base/7/x86_64 CentOS-7 - Base

[ovirt-users] Re: metrics

# yum search atomic-openshift Warning: No matches found for: atomic-openshift No matches found # yum repolist repo id repo name status !base/7/x86_64 CentOS-7 - Base 9911 !centos-sclo-rh-release/x86_64 CentOS-7 - SCLo rh 7514 !extras/7/x86_64 CentOS-7 - Extras 313 !ovirt-4.2/7 Latest

[ovirt-users] Re: metrics

Also, I believe that you need for now to install ansible 2.5.5 or 2.5.6 due to OpenShift bug. -- SHIRLY RADCO BI SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER Red Hat Israel TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:37 PM, Rich

[ovirt-users] Re: ERROR: integer out of range

Hi Is there a chance that one of the following Integers passed 2^32 - 1 ??? available_disk_size | integer confirmed_available_disk_size | integer used_disk_size| integer commited_disk_size| integer actual_images_size

[ovirt-users] Re: Docker best practices

Thx for all. 18.07.2018, 10:37, "Petr Kotas" :Hi Alex,would you mind being more specific with your question?What are you trying to achieve? According to documentation https://ovirt.org/feature/container-support/ there are two different approaches to working with Docker:1. run the container on

[ovirt-users] Re: metrics

do you have http://cbs.centos.org/repos/paas7-openshift-origin39-candidate/x86_64/os/Packages/ as one of your yum repos? What does "yum search atomic-openshift" show? On 07/19/2018 08:06 AM, supo...@logicworks.pt wrote: Hi, I'm still facing this issue Still this error: 1. Hosts:   

[ovirt-users] Re: metrics

Hi, I'm still facing this issue Still this error: 1. Hosts: localhost Play: Determine openshift_version to configure on first master Task: openshift_version : fail Message: Package atomic-openshift not found What i have installed: openshift-ansible-3.9.0-0.53.0.git.1.af49d87.el7.noarch

[ovirt-users] Re: Cannot start VM due to no active snapshot.

I can't write an elaborate response since I am away from my laptop, but a workaround would be to simply insert the snapshot back to the snapshots table You need to locate the snapshot's id in the logs where the failure occured and use vm's id insert into snapshots values ('', '', 'ACTIVE', 'OK',

[ovirt-users] Cannot start VM due to no active snapshot.

I've hit the issue described in: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/3393181 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561052 I have one VM with three disks that cannot start. Logs indicate a null pointer exception when trying to locate the snapshot. I've verified in the engine db that no

[ovirt-users] Re: ERROR: integer out of range

Hi Filip, could you please share with us complete engine logs using SOS log collector [1] and, if possible, engine database dump, so we can investigate the issue? Also do you remember any steps you have performed before this issue happened? Thanks Martin [1]

[ovirt-users] Re: OVIRT 4.2: MountError on Posix Compliant FS

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:06 PM wrote: > Hi Sandro, > > I finally mounted the GPFS Filesystem as a Data Domain using this > parameters on the form for New Domain : > > Domain Function: Data > Name: name_of_the_domain > Storage Type: Posix Compliant FS > Path: gpfs_kvm (the name of the

[ovirt-users] Re: OVIRT 4.2: MountError on Posix Compliant FS

Hi Sandro, I finally mounted the GPFS Filesystem as a Data Domain using this parameters on the form for New Domain : Domain Function: Data Name: name_of_the_domain Storage Type: Posix Compliant FS Path: gpfs_kvm (the name of the "device"/"filesystem" created, not an absoluthe path) VFS Type:

[ovirt-users] Re: Docker best practices

On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 at 02:37 Vincent Royer wrote: > We're using rancher on Ovirt and it's great. No problems to report. > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018, 1:08 PM Wesley Stewart, wrote: > >> I'm currently using CoreOS as a VM and I like it. RancherOS performs >> similarly, but appears to have a