[ovirt-users] Re: Managed Block Storage

2019-07-08 Thread Dan Poltawski
Hi, On Sun, 2019-07-07 at 09:31 +0300, Benny Zlotnik wrote: > Any chance you can setup gdb[1] so we can find out where it's stuck > exactly? Yes, abolutely - but I will need some assistance in getting GDB configured in the engine as I am not very familar with it - or how to enable the correct

[ovirt-users] oVirt 3.6: Node went into Error state while migrations happening

2019-07-08 Thread Christopher Cox
On the node in question, the metadata isn't coming across (state) wise. It shows VMs being in an unknown state (some are up and some are down), some show as migrating and there are 9 forever hung migrating tasks. We tried to bring up some of the down VMs that had a state of Down, but that

[ovirt-users] Re: Managed Block Storage

2019-07-08 Thread Dan Poltawski
On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 16:49 +0300, Benny Zlotnik wrote: > Not too useful unfortunately :\ > Can you try py-list instead of py-bt? Perhaps it will provide better > results (gdb) py-list 57if get_errno(ex) != errno.EEXIST: 58raise 59return

[ovirt-users] Re: Managed Block Storage

2019-07-08 Thread Dan Poltawski
On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 16:25 +0300, Benny Zlotnik wrote: > Hi, > > You have a typo, it's py-bt and I just tried it myself, I only had to > install: > $ yum install -y python-devel > (in addition to the packages specified in the link) Thanks - this is what I get: #3 Frame 0x7f2046b59ad0, for file

[ovirt-users] Re: Ovirt Secure boot issues

2019-07-08 Thread Strahil Nikolov
I have opened a bug : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1727987 for this issue. Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov As nobody has replied , I guess it is a new bug and I'm going to report it in bugzilla. workaround for anyone who hit this is to modify the grub menu as follows: FIX for

[ovirt-users] Re: Managed Block Storage

2019-07-08 Thread Dan Poltawski
Hi, On Sun, 2019-07-07 at 09:31 +0300, Benny Zlotnik wrote: > Any chance you can setup gdb[1] so we can find out where it's stuck > exactly? Yes, abolutely - but I will need some assistance in getting GDB configured in the engine as I am not very familar with it - or how to enable the correct

[ovirt-users] Re: Managed Block Storage

2019-07-08 Thread Benny Zlotnik
Can you try to create mutliple ceph volumes manually via rbd from the engine machine, so we can simulate what cinderlib does without using it, this can be done $ rbd -c ceph.conf create /vol1 --size 100M $ rbd -c ceph.conf create /vol2 --size 100M On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 4:58 PM Dan Poltawski

[ovirt-users] Re: Ovirt Secure boot issues

2019-07-08 Thread Strahil Nikolov
As nobody has replied , I guess it is a new bug and I'm going to report it in bugzilla. workaround for anyone who hit this is to modify the grub menu as follows: FIX for RHEL8:vim /boot/efi/EFI/redhat/grub.cfg### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/30_uefi-firmware ###menuentry 'Reboot' $menuentry_id_option

[ovirt-users] "Actual timezone in guest doesn't match configuration" for Windows VMs since guest agent 4.3

2019-07-08 Thread Matthias Leopold
Hi, the oVirt guest agent seems to report DST configuration for the timezone since version 4.3 (of the guest agent). this results in "Actual timezone in guest doesn't match configuration" messages in the UI for windows VMs because the timezone field can't be matched with oVirt configuration

[ovirt-users] Re: [ANN] oVirt 4.3.5 Fourth Release Candidate is now available for testing

2019-07-08 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
Il giorno lun 8 lug 2019 alle ore 16:45 Strahil Nikolov < hunter86...@yahoo.com> ha scritto: > Hi Sandro, > > I'm now currently running the latest RC and despite the issue with the > snapshot (should be in the mailing list) from this weekend - I think > everything is fine. > I have noticed that

[ovirt-users] Re: [ANN] oVirt 4.3.5 Fourth Release Candidate is now available for testing

2019-07-08 Thread Strahil Nikolov
Hi Sandro, I'm now currently running the latest RC and despite the issue with the snapshot (should be in the mailing list) from this weekend - I think everything is fine.I have noticed that qemu-guest-agent is now detected properly during snapshots (I have updated that in the relevant bug). The

[ovirt-users] Re: Managed Block Storage

2019-07-08 Thread Benny Zlotnik
Not too useful unfortunately :\ Can you try py-list instead of py-bt? Perhaps it will provide better results On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 4:41 PM Dan Poltawski wrote: > On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 16:25 +0300, Benny Zlotnik wrote: > > Hi, > > > > You have a typo, it's py-bt and I just tried it myself, I

[ovirt-users] Re: Managed Block Storage

2019-07-08 Thread Benny Zlotnik
Hi, You have a typo, it's py-bt and I just tried it myself, I only had to install: $ yum install -y python-devel (in addition to the packages specified in the link) On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 2:40 PM Dan Poltawski wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 2019-07-07 at 09:31 +0300, Benny Zlotnik wrote: > > > Any

[ovirt-users] Storage domain format version info

2019-07-08 Thread Gianluca Cecchi
Hello, part of updating a DC from 4.2 to 4.3 consists in updating format of data storage domains from V4 to V5. Questions: - where can I find list of differences between V4 and V5? And in general between previous ones? - can I force only a particular storage domain to remain in V4 while having the

[ovirt-users] Re: HE deployment failing

2019-07-08 Thread Strahil
Yes, But I thought that cockpit should prevent creation of the gluster volume 'engine' as it is too small. @Dev Do we have such control ? Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov On Jul 8, 2019 09:19, Parth Dhanjal wrote: > > Hey! > > The other 2 bricks were of 50G each. > I forgot to check that. > Sorry

[ovirt-users] Re: Active-Passive DR: mutual for different storage domains possible?

2019-07-08 Thread Eyal Shenitzky
I don't see any reason not to do it in case the SD replicas are separated storage domain. Just note that for the DR, you should prepare a separated DC with a cluster. P.S - I most to admit that I didn't try this configuration - please share your results. On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 10:45 AM Gianluca

[ovirt-users] Active-Passive DR: mutual for different storage domains possible?

2019-07-08 Thread Gianluca Cecchi
Hello, suppose I want to implement Active-Passive DR between 2 sites. Sites are SiteA and SiteB. I have 2 storage domains SD1 and SD2, that I can configure so that SD1 is active in storage array installed in SiteA with replica in SiteB and SD2 the reverse. I have 4 hosts: host1 and host2 in SiteA

[ovirt-users] Re: 4.2.8: NPE starting a specific VM

2019-07-08 Thread Arik Hadas
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 8:05 AM Richard Chan wrote: > There was a NIC that was Up + Unplugged. I have removed all NICs and > recreated them. The NPE remains. > Can you please provide the output of the following query: *select type, device, address, is_managed, is_plugged, alias from *>*

[ovirt-users] Re: HE deployment failing

2019-07-08 Thread Parth Dhanjal
Hey! The other 2 bricks were of 50G each. I forgot to check that. Sorry for the confusion. Thanks! On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:42 AM Sahina Bose wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:40 AM Parth Dhanjal wrote: > >> Hey! >> >> I used cockpit to deploy gluster. >> And the problem seems to be

[ovirt-users] Re: HE deployment failing

2019-07-08 Thread Sahina Bose
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:40 AM Parth Dhanjal wrote: > Hey! > > I used cockpit to deploy gluster. > And the problem seems to be with > 10.xx.xx.xx9:/engine 50G 3.6G 47G 8% > /rhev/data-center/mnt/glusterSD/10.70.41.139:_engine > > Engine volume has 500G available

[ovirt-users] Re: HE deployment failing

2019-07-08 Thread Parth Dhanjal
Hey! I used cockpit to deploy gluster. And the problem seems to be with 10.xx.xx.xx9:/engine 50G 3.6G 47G 8% /rhev/data-center/mnt/glusterSD/10.70.41.139:_engine Engine volume has 500G available Filesystem Size Used Avail Use%